At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?

[XaduBoxer]

You don't put 147 on your PAC-COTTO poll, yet you put 147 on the JMM-Cotto poll.

WHAT A FAG.

Why bring PAC on this thread?? You a PacNutSucker? ...
.

You ass. You fucking moron. I called you out on leaving Pac-Cotto at 147 on your other "poll." And yet you put JMM-Cotto at 147 as an option. Do you really think we are that stupid??

You ignorant chickenshit.
You would have Pac fight Calderon at 160 if you could. What a bitch.
I have never seen someone that was such a pathetic excuse for a poster or a fan.

Watch your language dude and your blood pressure... Calm down...

I already answered you why I intentionally left out the poll option "PAC-Cotto at 147" on the other thread... Hurry go to that thread now so that your suspicious mind will be cleared up... It will be good for your blood pressure too...
.

[boozeboxer]

Why bring PAC on this thread?? You a PacNutSucker? ...
.

You ass. You fucking moron. I called you out on leaving Pac-Cotto at 147 on your other "poll." And yet you put JMM-Cotto at 147 as an option. Do you really think we are that stupid??

You ignorant chickenshit.
You would have Pac fight Calderon at 160 if you could. What a bitch.
I have never seen someone that was such a pathetic excuse for a poster or a fan.

Watch your language dude and your blood pressure... Calm down...

I already answered you why I intentionally left out the poll option "PAC-Cotto at 147" on the other thread... Hurry go to that thread now so that your suspicious mind will be cleared up... It will be good for your blood pressure too...
.

I already read that thread (as has everyone else) and the logical conclusion is that:
a.) you have much more faith in JMM that you do on Pac
b.) that you are so biased you can't see the forest for pac's testes.