
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer

Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.
And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."
OK I'll give you a chance, try to correct the problem you see in this poll... I like to see how you will construct this poll, what are the options?
.
You would construct a PAC-Cotto one exactly like you did the JMM one.
Instead of throwing Berto, Cintron, and others in (like you give a shit about anyone other than Pac and Nonito) to fill the gaps and to add some tinted legitmacy to your poll but at the same time just have Pac-Cotto at 143.
Yeah, we won;t see through that.

Bookmarks