Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
Quote Originally Posted by boozeboxer View Post
Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post

The purpose of the first poll is to see if people here will scrap an exciting PAC-Cotto fight at 143 catchweight in favor of any fight at 147 against various legit welters that's why there's no "PAC-Cotto at 147" coz if I included that option, I have a feeling that option will win that poll...

The 2nd poll has no relation whatsoever to the 1st poll... Hope you got it...
.

So you had a feeling that a fight that would win the poll, which just so happened to be your fighter, and you didn't put it on the poll. Interesting.
Did you get the purpose of my 1st poll? It's kind of "PAC-Cotto at catchweight" or no "PAC-Cotto" fight at all...

Hope you get it now...
.

And then you put a JMM-Cotto fight at 147. THATS THE FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.


Look I am going to bed, your stamina is remarkable......that is one thing about PAC fans, they have stamina.

I can't believe I have been arguing with a turnip. However, I don't blame you for your shortcomings on the board Xaduboxer. I think you are either very smart and biased or really dumb.

And I don't think you are very smart.

However, you have kept us entertained on a pretty slow night in one way or another. Like a 2 dollar hooker....you get what you pay for.