Quote Originally Posted by boozeboxer View Post
Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
Quote Originally Posted by boozeboxer View Post


So you had a feeling that a fight that would win the poll, which just so happened to be your fighter, and you didn't put it on the poll. Interesting.
Did you get the purpose of my 1st poll? It's kind of "PAC-Cotto at catchweight" or no "PAC-Cotto" fight at all...

Hope you get it now...
.

And then you put a JMM-Cotto fight at 147. THATS THE FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.


Look I am going to bed, your stamina is remarkable......that is one thing about PAC fans, they have stamina.

I can't believe I have been arguing with a turnip. However, I don't blame you for your shortcomings on the board Xaduboxer. I think you are either very smart and biased or really dumb.

And I don't think you are very smart.

However, you have kept us entertained on a pretty slow night in one way or another. Like a 2 dollar hooker....you get what you pay for.
You're so dumb if you're thinking it's my time to sleep too...

"JMM-Cotto at 147" is a possibility that why it's there... It even got 2 votes... BTW I voted for 143...

You've been protesting that option coz you relate it to the other poll... Those 2 polls not related at all ... 2 separate and different polls...
.