Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: what fight do you like for pac? catchweight or 147?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1050
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: what fight do you like for pac? catchweight or 147?

    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    pacfans, what do you think?
    i think pac should challenge the 147 belt legitimately at 147, not on some catch weight! pac can be a 7th weight title holder in the process and turn his legacy into a greater one.
    on the other hand some are worried that the disparity of pac and cotto's weight during fight night would be too much for pac, that's why some think that "draining" cotto more on 144-145 is somewhat justifiable. yet what would his critics think of pac doing this? of course they would say it's a cowardly act! but remember: pac's ntural body mass is a featherweight's. yet to get cotto's belt of 147 in a catchweight of 144-145 is not really a noble act imo.
    pac should fight cotto at 147, and i think pac also has a chance because of his speed. why can't team pacquiao see this?
    The only answer you will get with the way ask the question is 147 and is my reply.

    Any weight between 140 and 147 is legitimate! Pacquiao is fighting the bigger man and your using the words "coward" and "not noble" to describe this fighter.

    A lot of people are stupid bying into the dehydration qualms.

    A lot of people also don't know what they are talking about when it comes to natural weight, fighting weight and qualifing weight.

    Pacquiao shoud do what is good for Pacquiao and not what a bunch of dopy people think.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1212
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: what fight do you like for pac? catchweight or 147?

    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    pacfans, what do you think?
    i think pac should challenge the 147 belt legitimately at 147, not on some catch weight! pac can be a 7th weight title holder in the process and turn his legacy into a greater one.
    on the other hand some are worried that the disparity of pac and cotto's weight during fight night would be too much for pac, that's why some think that "draining" cotto more on 144-145 is somewhat justifiable. yet what would his critics think of pac doing this? of course they would say it's a cowardly act! but remember: pac's ntural body mass is a featherweight's. yet to get cotto's belt of 147 in a catchweight of 144-145 is not really a noble act imo.
    pac should fight cotto at 147, and i think pac also has a chance because of his speed. why can't team pacquiao see this?
    The only answer you will get with the way ask the question is 147 and is my reply.

    Any weight between 140 and 147 is legitimate! Pacquiao is fighting the bigger man and your using the words "coward" and "not noble" to describe this fighter.

    A lot of people are stupid bying into the dehydration qualms.

    A lot of people also don't know what they are talking about when it comes to natural weight, fighting weight and qualifing weight.

    Pacquiao shoud do what is good for Pacquiao and not what a bunch of dopy people think.

    Yup, we have seen alot of supposedly good fighters getting beaten lately and they have people defending them as if they were the UNDERDOG in these fights. Pacquiao is not even big as superfeatherweight in todays standards both in height and torso frame yet people miniscules his accomplishments. I really do hope PAC wins his 7th division world title then retire, I could care less what other people think.
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Insights on the PAC-COTTO Catchweight match
    By Pavlik in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-25-2009, 08:19 AM
  2. Hatton Cotto at catchweight 143/144??
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 11-25-2008, 07:04 PM
  3. Boxing needs more catchweight fights.
    By eagle in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-18-2007, 04:12 PM
  4. Hatton/Castillo at catchweight - GREAT IDEA!!!
    By Greig in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-23-2007, 06:40 PM
  5. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-27-2006, 06:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing