Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 62

Thread: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Bilbo's Mom Guest

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ASIAN SENSATION View Post
    Any fighter should get credit for beating another fighter 5+ pounds heavier than him at fight night.
    Chagaev must have recived major props then for beating Valuev
    This is really so simply to understand.....

    If two fighters are of equal ability but one is bigger than because all other factors are even the bigger guy will win.

    However if one fighter is vastly better than the other fighter but the other fighter is bigger then the smaller but better fighter will still likely win because he better everywhere else.

    It's a simple equation.

    Manny beating Cotto is a much much much bigger deal than Chagaev beating Valuev because Valuev is inferior in every single regard to Cotto other than size.

    Manny would be beating a bigger and also elite fighter.

    Chagaev beat a bigger but mediocre fighter.

    How is that hard to understand?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1341
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    Agree with Bilbo. Manny should get full credit for beating Cotto at 145.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    661
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1073
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    i grasped the catchweight idea from the very first time bilbo explained it.



    wrong board this should be at the pac thread or is the pac thread made for spam only? no really?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1413
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    Everything to do with Pac should be on that other forum theyve had to make on here to keep the idiots away from discusiing boxing with real boxing fans

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    No, he should not recieve full credit. Now if he was to fight Cotto at 147 with none of these phoney strings attached I would give him full credit for the win. Manny is looking for big money fights whilst trying to avoid risk by bringing WW's down from their optimum fighting weights. There are no more big money fights at 140 for him so he is trying on this tactic.

    I refuse to give him much credit for that kind of carry on.

  6. #6
    Bilbo's Mom Guest

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    No, he should not recieve full credit. Now if he was to fight Cotto at 147 with none of these phoney strings attached I would give him full credit for the win. Manny is looking for big money fights whilst trying to avoid risk by bringing WW's down from their optimum fighting weights. There are no more big money fights at 140 for him so he is trying on this tactic.

    I refuse to give him much credit for that kind of carry on.
    Miles you are simply wrong mate.

    Had Oscar beaten Hopkins you wouldn't have credited him with that win?

    As he lost, does that mean he's fucking useless as Hopkins must surely have been weight drained at 158 lbs and Oscar still got knocked out?

    What about Hopkins win over Tarver? Tarver had just dropped down from heavyweight, Hopkins just beat a shell?

    What about Pavlik losing to Hopkins? That fight was at a catchweight of 170 lbs. Pavlik was dominated by a weight drained Hopkins who gave up double the amount of weight than the two pounds Cotto might have to.

    What about Joe Calzaghe's win over Hopkins? That was fought at 173 lbs so again Hopkins was weight drained. Why didn't they fight at the full 175 limit, does Calzaghe get no credit for that win?

    I honestly think you guys are just letting your hate overtake your common sense.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo's Mom View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    No, he should not recieve full credit. Now if he was to fight Cotto at 147 with none of these phoney strings attached I would give him full credit for the win. Manny is looking for big money fights whilst trying to avoid risk by bringing WW's down from their optimum fighting weights. There are no more big money fights at 140 for him so he is trying on this tactic.

    I refuse to give him much credit for that kind of carry on.
    Miles you are simply wrong mate.

    Had Oscar beaten Hopkins you wouldn't have credited him with that win?

    As he lost, does that mean he's fucking useless as Hopkins must surely have been weight drained at 158 lbs and Oscar still got knocked out?

    What about Hopkins win over Tarver? Tarver had just dropped down from heavyweight, Hopkins just beat a shell?

    What about Pavlik losing to Hopkins? That fight was at a catchweight of 170 lbs. Pavlik was dominated by a weight drained Hopkins who gave up double the amount of weight than the two pounds Cotto might have to.

    What about Joe Calzaghe's win over Hopkins? That was fought at 173 lbs so again Hopkins was weight drained. Why didn't they fight at the full 175 limit, does Calzaghe get no credit for that win?

    I honestly think you guys are just letting your hate overtake your common sense.
    I'm not clouded by hate in the slightest. I just happen to like the divisions we have and don't see the purpose nor point in having fighters not fighting at the given weights. If a 140 fighter is unable to get up to 147 then why should another fighter come down to a catchweight just to give the other guy more of a shot at pulling out the win. It's a lame move and I fail to see any merit in it.

    Anyway, this thread is talking about Pac against Cotto, so in this situation I see NO reason why Manny couldn't find Cotto at 147 pounds. Why even bother having negotiations trying to buy Manny a more favourable weight deal? If he can't deal with the weight then piss off and fight a 140 fighter.

    It's a simple logic.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    871
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Everything to do with Pac should be on that other forum theyve had to make on here to keep the idiots away from discusiing boxing with real boxing fans
    it just puzzles me why posers like you who calls other posters "idiots" and don't have a decent boxing analysis or opinion gets a positive rep! if you don't wanna see the name 'pac' then don't go to a thread with the name 'pac'.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    It's pretty obvious GAME hates Pac cuz he's still sourgraping from the defeats that Pac gave to his boy Barrera.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,722
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1250
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    A win over Cotto at any weight deserves mucho respect.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1413
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Pacquaio get credit for beating Cotto at 145

    Quote Originally Posted by ASIAN SENSATION View Post
    It's pretty obvious GAME hates Pac cuz he's still sourgraping from the defeats that Pac gave to his boy Barrera.

    Wow he beat a washed up Barrera and washed up Morales and washed up Oscar . Has Pac ever met a prime fighter? He talks of fighting Cotto but wants him to starve himself first . The only two prime guys he fought he got knocked out by . Fact

    it just puzzles me why posers like you who calls other posters "idiots" and don't have a decent boxing analysis or opinion gets a positive rep! if you don't wanna see the name 'pac' then don't go to a thread with the name 'pac'
    Thats my point that you lot should stick to your own forum and people who wana talk boxing should post on these boards. Why do you think that new forum has been made? Cuz you guys ruin every thread wherever you go.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-17-2009, 09:08 PM
  2. Replies: 96
    Last Post: 11-14-2008, 11:48 AM
  3. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 07-08-2007, 05:45 AM
  4. Is Pacquaio better than Cotto?
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-24-2007, 06:42 AM
  5. does calzaghe get credit for beating Eubank?
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 06-02-2007, 11:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing