How Can Anyone Now Rank Hopkins Lower than Roy Jones?

[JonesJrMayweather]

http://www.whudat.com/news/images/royjones_ko1.jpg

http://www.whudat.com/news/images/royjones_ko1.jpg

http://dragonballyee.blogs.com/photo...royjonesjr.jpg

http://www.startribune.com/stonline/.../fite16w.l.jpg

you can post the videos for all I care.....when you get finished searching the internet for photos, and trying to make a argument with weak circumstantial crap & when you want to know the answer the post answer this:

ON May 22, 1993 at RFK stadium when two fighters fought for the IBF middleweight belt, who won? don't speculate, don't use your opinion, don't go off what if...just answer the simple question: who that fight on 5/22/93 for the IBF MW belt?

Why speculate? When you can see for yourself who's better....

I love that you keep pointing out that Roy beat Hopkins 14 years ago. Its odd how things change. In the end, all of Roy's accomplishments will be good, but they will linger below what Hopkins has done. If I were Hopkins I would never worry about that loss to Jones, because comparitvley Hopkins has won over history.

I guess being undefeated for fifteen years and winning four titles in four divisions...isn't considered winning over history....

Listen hop is great..but after the tarver fight..bhop said he stayed at MW because the risk where lower and he could go after the record...now having said this...prior to jermain taylor beating bhop..who was the last middleweight to beat bhop? RJJ..so would hopkins' prized record of title defenses even exist had roy stayed at middleweight? no...so that accomplishment should have an asterix by it..much like the houston rockets winning the NBA title because micheal jordan decided to take a break....