Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Oh no call the boxing police we've got another catchweight!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2926
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Oh no call the boxing police we've got another catchweight!

    Miguel Cotto needs those extra pounds a lot more then Mayweather does. I would hate to see Cotto fight below 147, it just seems like it's the right weight class for him and he looks much better and fights much smarter at 147.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,786
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3650
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Oh no call the boxing police we've got another catchweight!

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Miguel Cotto needs those extra pounds a lot more then Mayweather does. I would hate to see Cotto fight below 147, it just seems like it's the right weight class for him and he looks much better and fights much smarter at 147.
    I agree with this. I'd like to see the Pac-Cotto fight at 147 as most fairly neutral fans would, considering what is on the line. But I have to hand it to Roach, love him or hate him for it, it was a nifty smoke and mirror trick to bring up the 143 possibility to have the fans take kinder to 145. He wants his guy to win, and is obv trying to get any edge.

    Also agree about the no belt on the line making a diff. in the negotiations too for the Mayweather fight, plus his ability to fight leaner.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2926
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Oh no call the boxing police we've got another catchweight!

    I could care less about the belts tbh. Boxing fans should disregard the alphabets entirely, and not just bring them up when it's to their advantage. Is this Cotto's WBO title people are talking about?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Insights on the PAC-COTTO Catchweight match
    By Pavlik in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-25-2009, 08:19 AM
  2. Catchweight for PAC, so what?!
    By Pavlik in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-04-2009, 10:40 AM
  3. what fight do you like for pac? catchweight or 147?
    By mad_takamura in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-28-2009, 04:51 PM
  4. Hatton Cotto at catchweight 143/144??
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 11-25-2008, 07:04 PM
  5. Boxing needs more catchweight fights.
    By eagle in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-18-2007, 04:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing