I got rid of sky sports because of that very reason... i only had it for the boxing and as all the main fights are on PPV i thought why bother... i'll just buy the PPV if they are worth it.
I got rid of sky sports because of that very reason... i only had it for the boxing and as all the main fights are on PPV i thought why bother... i'll just buy the PPV if they are worth it.
To be fair, the Mayweather-Marquez undercard is looking to be the best one we've had in sometime, with competitive fights right down the card.
But, Haye-Klitschko will most definitely not have that. I bet if they offered both for £20 they would make a bundle more than having them separate. I may stream the Haye-Klitschko one as that's a lot less likely to get shut off halfway through by HBO
i would prefer it to be on PPV cos i aint got skysports that way i have a choice, but thats for me for boxing in the UK it should be on skysports or even better terrestrial
The Mayweather undercard should be good I hope that Jamie Moore gets a slot on there against Martinez he deserves it.
I think Martinez is fighting him a week later in Madrid. If they got that on there as well, it would be as good a card for a super-fight as we've had this decade. Too often its the super-fight, a quality low profile fighter against a guy really not on his level, then bums waiting to get beat up by prospects. Hearing that Victor Ortiz might be on here as well, so this one's looking good. I'm sure the Haye undercard will be terrible though, Ryan Rhodes fighting some one-legged blind Latvian
They wont have two PPVs one week apart.
As good as the card is for hardcores, Floyd-Marquez will do complete shit, there needs to be UK bill added to that.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Both of these are PPV.
I'm only buying the Haye-Bitchsko one. Ain't paying £15 to watch Mayweather beat up a lightweight.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks