Re: At the risk of boxing blasphemy

Originally Posted by
Bilbo;766277[B
I've said nothing unreasonable at all in this thread[/B],
One possibility I think is the 'penis extension argument' whereby men like to have certain hardcore knowledge that elevates them above other men.
You said

Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Dominating the minimum weight division shouldn't really be considered a great thing as the level of competition down there is hardly noteworthy, it's like being the best team in the Civil Service football five aside league, doesn't mean a whole lot in the scheme of things.
Which implies you are aware of the abilities of the fighters in that division enough to pass judgement.
And would mean that this is a direct contradiction.

Originally Posted by
Bilbo
I admit I know next to nothing about him so am not stating he is overated just asking for people to tell me why he is not.
And then to the more unreasonable statement.................

Originally Posted by
Bilbo
If he was THAT good surely he could have at least gone up to super bantamweight or something.
So to be great he would have to jump 5 weight classes, by that rational that only all time greats are PAC, ODLH and PBF.
I know you like to try to kick my dick in the dirt by skirting issues with talk of penises, but it's clear to see where you are
heading when you start a thread like this. I do appreciate you assuming I would come back with name calling though, clearly
that's all I do here.
Last edited by killersheep; 07-24-2009 at 03:11 AM.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Bookmarks