Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: If you're the no1 contender to a belt...

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,329
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5159
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If you're the no1 contender to a belt...

    If I was a number one contender I would refuse step aside money...though they can still drop the belt........and fight a dominate champion, maybe get my azz kicked with big time exposure rather than fighting for the vacant strap against another so-so 'unknown' fighter even though I might be more likley to win the belt .

    Look back in any alphabet soup ranks and they usually held a vacant spot at the very top to at times shuttle in suspect 'contenders' for champs to knock out of the park.Then again,simply because we have never heard of them does not make them unworthy.Its a fine line but you can usually tell when they are being 'manipulated' but have always been in favor of a Champion meeting his top credible challengers,cleaning up division as opposed to jumping up to name network events.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,250
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1890
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If you're the no1 contender to a belt...

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    If I was a number one contender I would refuse step aside money...though they can still drop the belt........and fight a dominate champion, maybe get my azz kicked with big time exposure rather than fighting for the vacant strap against another so-so 'unknown' fighter even though I might be more likley to win the belt .

    Look back in any alphabet soup ranks and they usually held a vacant spot at the very top to at times shuttle in suspect 'contenders' for champs to knock out of the park.Then again,simply because we have never heard of them does not make them unworthy.Its a fine line but you can usually tell when they are being 'manipulated' but have always been in favor of a Champion meeting his top credible challengers,cleaning up division as opposed to jumping up to name network events.
    yeah, i feel that there really aren't any "up and comers" that are getting denied good fights, or fights for a belt.. if anything it's not really that hard to get a fight for a belt considering there are 4 champs in each division.

    the only time when this stuff bugs me is when some fighters are avoiding other fighters.. i know that it's hard to get business deals signed and what not, but it would be nice if there were some sort of standard where if you're a champ you have to fight another champ within a certain period of time or else you lose the belt.. and the money situation is split 50/50 or whatever.. that would be a nice "mandatory" fight because you would see the best vs the best as opposed to fighting some no name mandatory just to KO him.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. One Belt-ONe Champion
    By BigLuke in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-08-2008, 10:30 PM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-13-2007, 08:12 PM
  3. When will there be one belt again
    By Mr140 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-30-2007, 11:20 AM
  4. How the fwock did he get a belt????
    By ono in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 02-11-2007, 08:26 AM
  5. Hatton gives up WBA Belt
    By aangel in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 09-01-2006, 09:31 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing