Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: My Random Cotto vs Pacquiao ranting

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: My Random Cotto vs Pacquiao ranting

    I really don't understand why people who wish to be considered serious 'boxing analyst" would permit their cultural, national, or ethno prejudices influence the logical way of perceiving the obvious. I hear so many people whine about how, "oh, this boxer ran so damn much;" "oh,that boxer sucks now because he didn't throw as many combinations as he did last time;" or "oh, this boxer doesn't want to get inside because he knows he might get killed;" or "oh, that boxers thinks he the shit, therefore, I'm going for the other guy;" or "ah, that boxer isn't like Mike Tyson." Look, if you want to see amateur 'boxers' fight then I suggest you head to youtube and search for 'kimbo slice' or 'UFC', or keep ESPN classics on favorites (boxing), they have plenty. When you turn on the T.V and switch to 'ppv big fights', or 'hbo fights', you're going to see 'Professional' boxers at work, and the makeup of a professional boxer is to use his/her 'head' in order to win a fight. That doesn't mean they 'suck', on the contrary, it means they're smart, good, and it's one of the main reasons why they've made it where they're at today. It's called being 'technical', if you'd like to use 4-5 letter word semantics to influences others to seeing your way, then by all means do, but whatever you do, never make a bet or think you'll be correct when trying to predict any fight, or even think others will take you serious.

    Pacman is a right handed southpaw with a serious left; his speed is up with floyds, his power is irrefutable, and his aggression is unmatched in his weight division. I don't see who'd argue with that, much less prove it to be wrong; someone like an Erik morales, to me, is the boxer for manny at this point. Cotto, lets face it, is to me not going to last very long. Cotto has major aggression, yes, he does have speed, but he lack defense technique and I think you'll have to see it in every bout he's had. Cotto, I'd argue, would be a decent contender to manny, but not an equivalent. A Timothy Bradley would be a considerable opponent for pacman I think, Timothy has it all, plus a flawless record--not that that means much-- to which pacman can get a bit jealous of.
    Last edited by vilongo; 08-02-2009 at 12:06 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Is Miguel Cotto too BIG for Pacquiao?
    By miron_lang in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 08:18 AM
  2. When Pacquiao beats Cotto
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 124
    Last Post: 07-25-2009, 02:24 AM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-03-2009, 11:37 PM
  4. COTTO , PACQUIAO and PAVLIK - BOXING’S BIG THREE!
    By XaduBoxer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-13-2008, 02:59 AM
  5. BOBBY PACQUIAO IN MOSLEY-COTTO CARD
    By :::PSL::: in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 09-20-2007, 01:51 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing