
Originally Posted by
Majesty

Originally Posted by
Fenster
In 2005 Witter was rated no.5 best lightwelter on the planet by The Ring. Over the next couple of years, after winning the WBC title, he rose to no.1 best lightwelter on the planet according to The Ring.
If you are rated no.1 by The Ring it pretty much makes you a top fighter, right?
Now don't get upset ElTerribleMorales, my intention was not to "own" you, about Pac at flyweight, just to merely inform.

People intend to not acknowledge people for their wins but when they lose use it as proof that they would lose to their favorite fighter.
Never say a word when Witter was beating Corley and sparked out Vivian Harris, but now will scream to high heavens years later that he'd never beat Hatton because of how he looked against Bradley. Well given how Hatton looked against Mayweather and Pacquiao it could easily be said its just as plausible that Witter would have KO'd him. But those days are long gone but at one point Witter was one of the top light welters in the world and his recent losses won't change he was in that position once in his career regardless.
you mean the same Corley who had already lost to Judah, Mayweather, and Cotto, and would go on a 5 fight losing streak after the Witter fight? and the same Vivian Harris who had lost to the oh so talented Carlos Maussa by brutal KO

, and barely won in a lackluster fight against Lazcano just prior to the Witter loss? please i've always said that Witter was utter crap, said that
when he actually stepped up against DECENT world talent he'd lose, and surprise surprise, he lost to Bradley and now QUIT against Alexander, i don't think much of Hatton, and think that Hatton would have owned Witter at any point of their careers, if he didn't ko him, the pussy would have just flat out quit, he's utter garbage, perfect example of a dude with a big mouth and not enough skills, heart, or balls to back it up
Bookmarks