I kinda like this honestly, just hand them out for super fights and make them a big deal, like bracelets in poker. Plus, this has a chance to be the coolest looking boxing belt ever.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
I kinda like this honestly, just hand them out for super fights and make them a big deal, like bracelets in poker. Plus, this has a chance to be the coolest looking boxing belt ever.
Array
I have never known of any sport to do such damage to its self as boxing.
Dana White(UFC bloke) is right,ufc is not killing boxing,boxing is killing its self.
All in the name of greed.
Balls
Array
I've never heard such crap in all my boxing time. The WBC should pick up their catchweight bullshit and drag its ass back off to the room they sat in to think it up.
Hell, I guess with so much emphasis on Pound 4 Pound these days maybe they should just scrap weight divisions altogether and just let it be a damn free for all and fight it out for P4P king title and rankings......
This catchweight shit is for people who are not willing to clean up their own division and seek out a purely money orientated bout. What happened to boxing being classed as a sport, rather than simply a business.
Last edited by TheMacMagician; 08-07-2009 at 08:07 AM.
Array
I don't think it's such a bad thing to be honest, mainly it sounds like it's going to be used as a trophy when one of their champions fights someone from a higher division who can't meet the weight limit.
I think it has to be used carefully, for existing champions only and catchweight fights where no other belts are applicable.
Kinda funny how people were complaining about Cotto's title being on the line or anything and saying "well there's no belt for 145 pounds!" Well now there is![]()
Array
The belt sounds good, but the the idea is s**t.
Array
One of the funniest and silliest thing ever, I wonder if they will make a ranking of the catch weight contender as well and I REALLY wonder how it'll be done. My biggest question on the matter though is: who is the worst, the suckers who create this non-sense title or those who will pay the sanctioning fees to retain such crap?
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
This is getting down right ridicules.
Last edited by jon09; 08-07-2009 at 03:26 PM.
Array
You have to be f!!!ng kidding.
A belt to honor the best fighting the best?Used to be the idea behind a crowning a championRight?They need to just start selling these dime store trinkets at the nearest Quickie Mart.Alot easier and a much more honest transaction !!
Last edited by Spicoli; 08-08-2009 at 12:08 AM.
And its NOT a bad idea at all
Pacquiao is the champ at 140 Cotto is the champ at 147.
So the thing is when a champion moves up and its a catchweight since you people complained so much about Cotto's title being on the line. Now you have a belt on the line for when a champion moves up to a catchweight with the other champion. That way neither could lose their title but there is still something to win to show who is better between them. To me it makes a lot of sense especially since all the fans could do was complain that a 147 champ shouldnt put their title on the line in a match where the limit is 145. You fans got something that makes sense and gives you little more to complain about and you bash it. Some fans just don't know what they want. You complain about one thing and then once you get a solution you complain about that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks