These catch weights ideas are slowly but surely drifting on the very ludicrous side of boxing, worst idea ever if you ask me.
These catch weights ideas are slowly but surely drifting on the very ludicrous side of boxing, worst idea ever if you ask me.
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
gotta admit it makes for interesting reading tho & gets them more media coverage even if never happens (bit like haye fighting for heavy title)
And just when I thought that this catchweight crap couldn't get any worse.....
I'd love to see him fight Pavlik, maybe Manny's head could get stuck up Pavlik's arse by accident, maybe the BS from his camp / lovers would die down a little then......
god i hope not there are enough catchweight threads
Almost all what has been said above was said when Manny signed to fight Oscar.
After who he has beaten I would say Pac-Man stands a chance against anybody.(apart from very big blokes)
Balls
if by anybody you mean shot fighters who starve themselves to make a weight that benefits only Pacquiao, than you're right, and as Killersheep said, if he wont even fight Cotto at the max limit of welterweight, he has no reason to look at any jr.middleweights or middleweights
Reading from your posts I know you're an Oscar fan (you can't call me a Pacnuthugger), but didn't your idol weight drain Bernard Hopkins at 158 to fight for his MW titles? In one thread you were defending that and then said what Pacquiao is doing to COtto is wrong. Let's have some consistency here.
And it was your idol that called out the former flyweight champion to fight him for another big pay day. Your idol Oscar has a habit of making guys jump 2 weight classes to fight him or weight drain his opponents. Shane Mosely is another example of an 135 pound guy jumping 2 weight classes to fight him at 147, Bernard Hopkins weight draining himself to 158, Pacman jumping 2 weight classes, etc.
If Pacman learned how to maximize his advantages in the ring, it's probably from Oscar.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks