I think Jones-Hopkins should just stay as it is. As a fight that happened a long time ago but when both men were close to their best (certainly a lot closer than they are now) and Jones won relatively easily with one hand. If they fought now I think Hopkins wins comfortably but he has aged better than Jones due to the fact Jones has always relied on his freak athleticism and speed whereas Hopkins is a great boxer with great fundamentals.
To me boxers should be judged against each other prime for prime and though many didn't realise at the time that these were future ATG's(I think it was actually the undercard to Riddick Bowe - Jesse Ferguson) Roy Jones and Bernard Hopkins fought very close to their primes, Hopkins was 28 and didn't lose again for 12 years and Roy Jones one year later totally schooled many people's p4p #1 at the time in James Toney.
I think Dawson may have a few problems with Johnson yet though but I think he takes a close one again but as far as Hopkins goes, you never know when the fight is going to come that he does age all of a sudden (and it will), but if he is in the same form as he was against Pavlik then I would go with a quite comfortable B-Hop win!
Bookmarks