Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 56

Thread: Was Lennox truly dull?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in space
    Posts
    1,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1104
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Lennox truly dull?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Lennox Lewis beat Holyfield and Tyson in their prime? lol
    The Brits tend to overrate their champs, see Ricky Hatton as a prime example.

    Yes Lewis did beat Holyfield twice, and beat Tyson, but let's not say he beat them at their prime. Holyfield was 37 when they met, and Tyson was a washed up fighter.
    and yeah lennox got holyfield and tyson out of their prime but he still did what he had to do, i do believe a 20 year old tyson beats anyone in history tho
    Pleased to make your acquaintance

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    5,575
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1249
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Lennox truly dull?

    I personally didn't think he beat Mercer or Holy the second time.
    Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in space
    Posts
    1,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1104
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Lennox truly dull?

    Quote Originally Posted by VanChilds View Post
    I personally didn't think he beat Mercer or Holy the second time.
    agree with u on the 2nd holyfield fight van, thought he beat mercer tho, whens ur next stint may i ask mate
    Pleased to make your acquaintance

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    in slum area
    Posts
    1,631
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1191
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Lennox truly dull?

    I don't think lennox is slow, he's intelligent, cautious. He tends to measure his opponent first. He isn't a brawler but if given the oppotunity he seize it.

    Just like the Grant and Botha fight.
    Hidden Content
    RIP, Crazy Samurai. Thank you for your Drumming.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    5,575
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1249
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Lennox truly dull?

    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by VanChilds View Post
    I personally didn't think he beat Mercer or Holy the second time.
    agree with u on the 2nd holyfield fight van, thought he beat mercer tho, whens ur next stint may i ask mate
    not sure...dont' think it will be till late 2010
    Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Suffolk
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    859
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Lennox truly dull?

    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Lennox Lewis beat Holyfield and Tyson in their prime? lol
    The Brits tend to overrate their champs, see Ricky Hatton as a prime example.

    Yes Lewis did beat Holyfield twice, and beat Tyson, but let's not say he beat them at their prime. Holyfield was 37 when they met, and Tyson was a washed up fighter.
    and yeah lennox got holyfield and tyson out of their prime but he still did what he had to do, i do believe a 20 year old tyson beats anyone in history tho
    Tyson in his prime was great. The fantasy fight everyone talks about is Tyson vs Ali. I think a Tyson vs Joe Frazier would have made for a more exciting fight to watch.
    I think Lewis was a bit boring too but nothing compared to the Klitchko,s.
    The Shagaev fight is a prime example of that. Like all there other fights they could have finished him off in half the time. Is it because there fighting incredibly safe or trying to make the opponent look like he has a chance. Everyone in the heavyweight devision seems to be too stupid and slow to work out how to avoid their jab jab punch technique.
    Is there anyone out there who can bring the heavyweight devision back to life.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Lennox Lewis
    By Hunter in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-02-2009, 12:23 PM
  2. How well known was Lennox Lewis
    By ararghhh in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 01-09-2009, 04:39 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-19-2008, 02:41 AM
  4. Lennox vs Holyfield III?
    By WelshDevilRob in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-26-2008, 09:49 PM
  5. Dull fights Last Night?
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-24-2007, 02:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing