Here's the Texas judge being interviewed. Hot off the press, "How sir do you justify that scoring?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znowCx_y7nU
Here's the Texas judge being interviewed. Hot off the press, "How sir do you justify that scoring?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znowCx_y7nU
Funny how Paulie bitched about Caiz but he was the one with the right score, or at least in Paulie's eyes the least crappy score.
i had Malignaggi winning 7 to 5, so that said there is not fucking way it could be 118-110, if you seriously think that a score like that is ok, then you're seriously blind, didn't Caiz score it 116-112? that itself is a stretch, i don't think Diaz could have gotten anymore than 116-113, when it comes to boxing Houston is full of shit, first John got screwed against Juarez and now this, fuck that
Caiz had it 115-113 I think.
And I don't think you meant me but no I don't think 118-110 was a good score.
It's just very discouraging and disappointing really. And no, it isn't just Texas.
No idea how many times I sat here with others in the last year, with everyone in complete agreement going, "WTF was that, rigged!!" I just know it was wayyyy too many.
This was a close fight, and there were some rounds that could have gone either way. I wouldn't of had a problem with a draw, or 115-113 in favor of either guy, but 118-110 is complete bull$hit.
I don't like Paulie, but even I don't hate him enough to give him that kind of score.
diaz won that fight
u cant win a fight by doing nothing but jabbing if u are among the weakest punchers in the divison AND u get hit with power punches way too often
anyway, gale van hoye isnt being corrupt cuz hes from texas
van hoye has never been a good judge, not that i even disagree with that score
Holy fuck, Sal makes an appearance. I thought you were dead or in jail.
This result was no robbery or a total outrage.Contrast in style and delivery and Pov.You will always get this when one goes back and one comes forward...no matter the 'effective aggressiveness' or 'ring generalship'.He knew the deal going in and fought like he wanted to say "See,I told ya" at the end...Paulie should consider a team sport if its others he wants to blame.
I completely agree with Malignaggi he had all the reason wo went off like he did in the interview.
And the sad part is what Kellerman said at the end, le me see if I can look it up in the Tube
I found this one: Well said Paul " Boxing is full of shit..."
YouTube - Paulie Malignaggi gets robbed against Juan Diaz - Interview and Classic Rant
Last edited by Puya; 08-23-2009 at 03:40 AM.
Que Viva Puerto Rico
Hidden Content
It was a close fight & could have gone either way, I had Paulie ahead. But that score is just crazy!!! How the f*ck do these judges get away with this sh*t? Any other job I know of; if you f*ck up big (like this) you get warnings, written, verbal etc then eventually fired, but these chumps keep getting away with it over & over & nothing seems to happen
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
The judges were terrible. One of the scores for Jacobs-Smith was ridiculous too. As for Diaz winning, it was a close fight that could have gone either way. Paulie has had a couple lucky breaks in close fights in the past so I dont really feel bad for him to be honest.
Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle
Obviously Paulie is P4P and his career has been ruined by buddy mcgirt and bad judging. I mean fine Cotto whipped his ass but that happens to most ppl that cotto fights. The hatton fight was buddies fault. I'm happy that the real Paulie is back. If he had just a little more Pop he'd be a top 5 P4p fighter, but as it is, he's top 15 or so. Hopefully he'll get a shot to expose Bradley or devon alexander.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks