Gale Van hoy...118-110

[BoomBoom]

Definately a few odd ones. 117-111 Taylor over Spinks for one, he also worked a lot of Diaz earlier fights. As I said before, I think this judge honestly has the fight 10-2 Diaz otherwise he would have scored it 116-112 or something. Poor judging, absolutely. Should he be suspended, imo yes, but I really blame whoever appointed this judge to work the fight knowing that he had a long history judging Diaz fights. Maybe judges should only be allowed to judge a fighter in no more than two fights ever so they dont grow to like a fighter. There are enough judges too mix it up.

[Spicoli]

Haa feels like a witch hunt.Hey just looking it over ....man he (?) had Azumah Nelson over Hernandez 114-113.Nelson Pressured in that one,Genaro boxing at range

[Spicoli]

Rafa Marquez 96-91 over Too sharp Johnson #1...including 2 point deducts.hmm

[El Kabong]

The more questionable results for me are as follows:

The John-Juarez fight seems a tad suspicious, I thought John was up a round or two.

Diaz-Katsidis maybe?

Taylor-Spinks...that was one of JT worst performances and GVH had it 117-111 Taylor

Oh a GLARING error 112-115 when the other two judges had it 116-111 for Sam Peter vs James Toney.

Larry Mosley-Golden Johnson the other judges have it 116-112 and 114-114 but GVH scored it 113-115

I do give him credit for getting Barrett-Guinn right as Dommonick was an undefeated prospect at the time. BUt other than that there are plenty of shady scorings