Manny Pacquao, How great is he???

[Pacdbest2]

Hope this does not turn into a massive argument between Pac Lovers and haters.


In my eyes he just seems to get better and better with each fight.


How great is he?

How great will he be if he beats Cotto?


I will stick my head above the parapit and say that he is a p4p top 10 all time great and is getting better.



The greatest fighter since Ali IMO.





Ok,now all the Pac Haters can slag me off.

For me he's is the Greatest I've seen. I started Wacthing Boxing in the 70s with Ali, Duran & SRL. I think He surpassed them all already.

[generalbulldog]

Hope this does not turn into a massive argument between Pac Lovers and haters.


In my eyes he just seems to get better and better with each fight.


How great is he?

How great will he be if he beats Cotto?


I will stick my head above the parapit and say that he is a p4p top 10 all time great and is getting better.



The greatest fighter since Ali IMO.





Ok,now all the Pac Haters can slag me off.

For me he's is the Greatest I've seen. I started Wacthing Boxing in the 70s with Ali, Duran & SRL. I think He surpassed them all already.

Let the nuthuggers and haters now battle.

[Truth]

I disagree that the Barrera, Morales and Marquez fights are what will determine the bulk of his legacy. These fights as impressive as they were happened when he wasn't the face of the sport as he is today. I think what will define his legacy in most is his current reign as P4P king. Which so far has been nearly flawless but I believe a lot of his and Mayweather's legacy depend on when they face each other & what happens.

[Mr140]

Well to be honest i have him in top 30 somewhere which i thinks fair. But to be honest i cant put him in the top 10 ever because i have Sugar Ray Leonard in that spot. To me Pac while never be as good as Leonard was. But thats just me if you disagree well to each his own i guess.

[Mr140]

To be honest i have Pac rated in the same place i have Holyfeild rated. Some may disagree because of Holyfeild loses but thats mostly due to him staying in boxing to long. We while have to see if Pac while hang around past his prime like Holyfeild, Leonard and many others have done.

[leftylee]

I have to agree with Ice. He is a great fighter but somehwhat overrated. A lot of people are blinded by the De La Hoya and Hatton fights and forget what Marquez did to him.

He is by no means invincible or any shiit like that, I think Mayweather beats him. And there are also question marks over Cotto. I mean how much did Margarito take out of him. Look at how he looked in the Clottey fight. I don't think Pacquiao will gain massive amounts of great credit if he beats Cotto. Of course he'll gain a lot and so he should. But Mosely is pretty much the man at welterweight right now, and Cotto looks to be on the slide. And I think when Pacquiao beats Cotto (Which I think he will) people will raise the question of the catchweight at what they fought. IMO anyways.

[Mr140]

I dont think Cotto while be his best win be honest with you. His best wins and lose are some what of a question mark if you ask me. I thought he lost to both Mosley and Clottey and then to Margarito, Which we may never know unless they have rematch which may still happen i guess.

[killersheep]

I have to agree with Ice. He is a great fighter but somehwhat overrated. A lot of people are blinded by the De La Hoya and Hatton fights and forget what Marquez did to him.

He is by no means invincible or any shiit like that, I think Mayweather beats him. And there are also question marks over Cotto. I mean how much did Margarito take out of him. Look at how he looked in the Clottey fight. I don't think Pacquiao will gain massive amounts of great credit if he beats Cotto. Of course he'll gain a lot and so he should. But Mosely is pretty much the man at welterweight right now, and Cotto looks to be on the slide. And I think when Pacquiao beats Cotto (Which I think he will) people will raise the question of the catchweight at what they fought. IMO anyways.

The thing is how ever much you discount his resume, can you historically name 20 people who have better resumes with better success.

[josef4334]

I have to agree with Ice. He is a great fighter but somehwhat overrated. A lot of people are blinded by the De La Hoya and Hatton fights and forget what Marquez did to him.

He is by no means invincible or any shiit like that, I think Mayweather beats him. And there are also question marks over Cotto. I mean how much did Margarito take out of him. Look at how he looked in the Clottey fight. I don't think Pacquiao will gain massive amounts of great credit if he beats Cotto. Of course he'll gain a lot and so he should. But Mosely is pretty much the man at welterweight right now, and Cotto looks to be on the slide. And I think when Pacquiao beats Cotto (Which I think he will) people will raise the question of the catchweight at what they fought. IMO anyways.

which a lot of people including you thought he was gonna get slaughtered in those fights... the hating continues and so on.....

[Violent Demise]

He's a sure Hall of Famer. And he's top 100 all time. Around 97 or 98. Great accomplishments. He's had a great career. Anybody that rates him the top 10 is clearly someone who goes to his house every weekend and sucks his dikk. Either that or there just plain idiots who don't know the sport.

[porkypara]

He's a sure Hall of Famer. And he's top 100 all time. Around 97 or 98. Great accomplishments. He's had a great career. Anybody that rates him the top 10 is clearly someone who goes to his house every weekend and sucks his dikk. Either that or there just plain idiots who don't know the sport.

Yep,you are the type of poster that has put me off this site in the last year or so.


Full of your own self importance but in reality you are just like a spoilt child.

[DaxxKahn]

He's a sure Hall of Famer. And he's top 100 all time. Around 97 or 98. Great accomplishments. He's had a great career. Anybody that rates him the top 10 is clearly someone who goes to his house every weekend and sucks his dikk. Either that or there just plain idiots who don't know the sport.

97-98 ....Cmon VD you know damn well he is no 97 or 98th ranked atg.....

Even if you don't want to agree with the top 10....and until all is said and done I would not rank him there but a top 25 certainly

[Violent Demise]

He's a sure Hall of Famer. And he's top 100 all time. Around 97 or 98. Great accomplishments. He's had a great career. Anybody that rates him the top 10 is clearly someone who goes to his house every weekend and sucks his dikk. Either that or there just plain idiots who don't know the sport.

Yep,you are the type of poster that has put me off this site in the last year or so.


Full of your own self importance but in reality you are just like a spoilt child.

There's still work to be done. Since your still actually here

He's a sure Hall of Famer. And he's top 100 all time. Around 97 or 98. Great accomplishments. He's had a great career. Anybody that rates him the top 10 is clearly someone who goes to his house every weekend and sucks his dikk. Either that or there just plain idiots who don't know the sport.

97-98 ....Cmon VD you know damn well he is no 97 or 98th ranked atg.....

Even if you don't want to agree with the top 10....and until all is said and done I would not rank him there but a top 25 certainly

Do you have any idea how many great fighters there's been in the history of Boxing? Being ranked in the top 100 is a great accomplishment. Why make it an insult?

[Mr140]

Sorry Pacbest i cant agree with you pac is a great fighter. But even if he beats Cotto i still cant rank him above Leonard he beat better fighters. Not only that but he was able to do more in the ring as well. Pac is should be rated along the lines of Holyfeild or Hopkins ithink thats fair enough.

[porkypara]

He's a sure Hall of Famer. And he's top 100 all time. Around 97 or 98. Great accomplishments. He's had a great career. Anybody that rates him the top 10 is clearly someone who goes to his house every weekend and sucks his dikk. Either that or there just plain idiots who don't know the sport.

Yep,you are the type of poster that has put me off this site in the last year or so.


Full of your own self importance but in reality you are just like a spoilt child.

There's still work to be done. Since your still actually here

He's a sure Hall of Famer. And he's top 100 all time. Around 97 or 98. Great accomplishments. He's had a great career. Anybody that rates him the top 10 is clearly someone who goes to his house every weekend and sucks his dikk. Either that or there just plain idiots who don't know the sport.

97-98 ....Cmon VD you know damn well he is no 97 or 98th ranked atg.....

Even if you don't want to agree with the top 10....and until all is said and done I would not rank him there but a top 25 certainly

Do you have any idea how many great fighters there's been in the history of Boxing? Being ranked in the top 100 is a great accomplishment. Why make it an insult?

Been here since 2004 so it would take more than a knob jocky like your self to make me quit this site.


I guess back in 2004 you would have been about 3 or 4 years old which would make you around 8 or 9 now.