Could an argument be made that Ishe Smith beat Daniel Jacobs?

[No Contest]

Ishe Smith is hard to look good against, he can be patient to the point of boring you to death. Jacobs was probably throwing first the whole night, and I havent even seen the fight. Am I right?

[jokaleras]

i thought jacobs won. but he needs a lot of work.

[ElTerribleMorales]

i thought that Jacobs did enough to win, but on that note, he wasn't too impressive, Smith is naturally a smaller fighter, and although he has that Wright quality of making anyone look bad against him, IMO Jacobs just pretty much didn't force the fight enough, that said i had Jacobs winning 115-113

[gest12645]

115-113? wow and I thought 100-89 was bad 115-113 is a quite horrible score for a 10 rounder

Jacobs won the fight clearly and I cant see an argument that Ishe won

btw Smith was an asshole during the fight..

[ElTerribleMorales]

115-113? wow and I thought 100-89 was bad 115-113 is a quite horrible score for a 10 rounder

Jacobs won the fight clearly and I cant see an argument that Ishe won

btw Smith was an asshole during the fight..

hahaha my bad put up my Malignaggi/Diaz score, hey give me a break i made the post at like 2 am, either way i had it 96-94 Jacobs, thought he controlled it early then basically let Smith fight at his pace getting the better of the fight on the second half, although i thought Jacobs won, it was far from a dominating win, he still needs a lot of improvement

[gest12645]

hehe , ihad it 97-92,

[ElTerribleMorales]

hehe , ihad it 97-92,

and i don't think your score is too crazy either, it just depends on what you were looking for, but IMO no way it could have been ruled a clean sweep, i think we can all agree that Jacobs still needs a lot of work