I haven't watched this but I do remember the guy, he made a reasonable case for Hatton KO'ing Pacquaio, reasonable enough for me to think hmm, he might be right, and then nahhh.![]()
I haven't watched this but I do remember the guy, he made a reasonable case for Hatton KO'ing Pacquaio, reasonable enough for me to think hmm, he might be right, and then nahhh.![]()
Tbh though, I don't think anybody thought Pac would destroy Hatton as quick as he did. I saw it as about 60/40 in Pac's favour, but I didn't see him bulldozing him. Also seeing as I'd spent hard-earned money on a ticket, I would've liked it if he'd let him hang in there a couple more rounds.
I probably had it more like 70/30 but like always I start to figure out ways for the other guy to win as the fight gets closer.
Having watched the Froch one and about half of the Abraham one, meh, I agree and disagree with this guy. He makes it out like Froch is harder to hit than he is. And I kind of want to pick Taylor, like he does. I agree with him about Taylor in some respects and not others, he doesn't pay attention to the details and he doesn't really think in there or pick his shots but I wouldn't say he overwhelms his opponents with activity.
Yeah, actually I was probably like 70/30 as well originally, but as the fight snuck up & I got more annoyed with the PacMania invasion we had at the time, I just started to get this sneaking suspicion that Hatton just had a little something that Pac couldn't handle, pushing it to 60/40. I've learnt my lesson though... although I've got this funny feeling that Miguel Cotto might just be able to... or no.
Oh & Froch is hard to hit if you don't have any of the following -
A speed advantage
A reach advantage
Competent boxing ability
Arms
And Jermain Taylor does not have one of the best jabs in the sport.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks