
Originally Posted by
CFH
What rounds did you score for Froch?
I didn't score it on a round by round but I never felt any rounds were really decisive.
I think there is a lot of Froch hate on the boards and a lot of attention on his ugly fighting style and looking awkward against fast, slick opponents.
He certainly DID look awkward and missed wildly at time but at the same time Froch made the fight. He was constantly coming forward and throwing punches, and Dirrell mostly dodged and held on. He only came back with anything later in the fight, the championship rounds.
Let me ask you this, if one fighter comes forward for a whole round, throws punches and misses, but the other fighter doesn't come forward at all, and just dodged, who wins the round?
That is the question really, yes Dirrell made Froch look bad at times but he didn't do anything offensively himself in most of the rounds.
In such cases I guess two of the judges went for the fighter who was at least pressing the action and throwing punches.
I don't think it was a robbery, I think it could have gone either way.
Dirrell was a class act after the fight, Froch did what every puncher did after the fight and blamed his erratic style on his opponent's running.
Clearly the commentators, the judges and the other ringside reporters judging all scored it a very very close fight.
Opinions on here tend to be biased a bit and I think people have overreacted a bit on the robbery.
If Dirrell would have won it would have been totally fair though as well. Close fight.
Bookmarks