Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
I agree with Saddo on this, neither guy should be considered champ after that. Dirrell showed that when he chose to open up with combinations Froch had no chance skill wise, unfortunately most of the fight he spent running in to hug and run away, which is frustrating, because with his hand speed it looked to me like he could have had an easy night of it.
Froch was delusional thinking that he did enough to win as well though, just because you are coming forward doesn't mean you win especially when you aren't landing anything. He can get frustrated all he wants about Dirrell not standing to trade, fact is the few times that did happen Froch was on the short end of the stick in the exchange. I saw Froch land one meaningful punch that entire fight, to which Dirrell punched him back at the end and Froch withdrew.
Bottom line is Fenster is right that Dirrell deserved to lose, maybe in hind sight he will realize "maybe I should have punched him in the mouth more"
I'm not outraged by the decision, but I am extremely frustrated with Dirrell's performance, no less so than Froch's a suplex should at least merit a warning.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Bookmarks