Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

[Pugilistic]

I know you can't but like the others you don't address the falling to the knees shit, same as the Hopkins fans don't seem to remember Bernard clutching his balls like a fucking loser trying to steal the fight againsed Joe.

One guy wants to fight, the other tries to steal it by doing stupid shit like faking fouls and going to his knees. As a judge what the fucking hell would you do seriously?

"He is trying to get a point taken off Joe to win the fight, what genius"

"I like the guy who keeps falling to his knees to avoid shots, smart stuff"

What has Bernard got to do with this ? We are talking about Dirrell - Froch.

Dirrell wasn't faking anything, Froch fought a very dirty fight.

What Dirrell did like clinching etc shouldn't affect the scoring unless the ref takes action like deducting a point. Dirrell was still landing more and throwing more.

Based on the 4 scoring criterias in a fight:

Clean Effective Punching
Effective Aggression
Ring Generalship
Defense

Dirrell clearly won.

It's all in black and white (depending on your monitor settings) what I had to say, the Hopkins reference was an example, but you already knew that I hope.

The difference between the Hopkins - Calzaghe fight and the Froch - Dirrell fight is Calzaghe's aggression was actually effective as he threw more than Hopkins and was able to land some shots especially as the fight went on.

Froch on the other hand came forward but threw less than Dirrell the whole fight and landed literally nothing.