 |
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.Originally Posted by amat
Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.
Froch knew after the 2nd round Dirrell wasn't going to win with his ultra negative style. So he never got into panic mode where he NEEDED a KO.
Fighting in the States he KNOWS he will get robbed even if he outboxes Dirrell. So the mindest from the off will be KO.
It's very clear amat. You have to think outside the box.
Last edited by Fenster; 10-19-2009 at 07:11 AM.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
BUCK WILD
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
[quote=Fenster;799587][
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.
Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.
So froch hits so hard, even when he doesnt hit his opponent the wind from his fist going by creates a percussion that shocks his opponents??...Is that what you are saying?
Frosh landed cleanly on Dirrell and Dirrell walked through the shots, when Dirrell landed cleanly Froch started to do the chicken dance.......
I think that points to a Dirrell KO in the rematch.....
PETA = People Eating Tasty Animals
The only Acceptable Gun Control Law: Always use two hands when firing.
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
[QUOTE=Hunter;799665]I'm saying if Froch had hit him he may have hurt him. Trust me.[
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.
Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.
So froch hits so hard, even when he doesnt hit his opponent the wind from his fist going by creates a percussion that shocks his opponents??...Is that what you are saying?
Frosh landed cleanly on Dirrell and Dirrell walked through the shots, when Dirrell landed cleanly Froch started to do the chicken dance.......
I think that points to a Dirrell KO in the rematch.....
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
BUCK WILD
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
[quote=Fenster;799670]Sorry - I cant trust you on this one even if you are the former Saddo Prediction Comp Champion-FACT.......Froch did land cleanly on Dirrell and Froch's punches didnt hurt dirrell. I saw it with my own two eyes.....When Dirrell landed to Froch's noggin, he started to stagger around like a high schooler after doing his first beer bong...I'm saying if Froch had hit him he may have hurt him. Trust me.[
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.
Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.
So froch hits so hard, even when he doesnt hit his opponent the wind from his fist going by creates a percussion that shocks his opponents??...Is that what you are saying?
Frosh landed cleanly on Dirrell and Dirrell walked through the shots, when Dirrell landed cleanly Froch started to do the chicken dance.......
I think that points to a Dirrell KO in the rematch.....
Last edited by Hunter; 10-19-2009 at 12:20 PM.
PETA = People Eating Tasty Animals
The only Acceptable Gun Control Law: Always use two hands when firing.
...bigger than Jesus
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
[quote=Fenster;799670]I'm saying if Froch had hit him he may have hurt him. Trust me.[
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.
Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.
So froch hits so hard, even when he doesnt hit his opponent the wind from his fist going by creates a percussion that shocks his opponents??...Is that what you are saying?
Frosh landed cleanly on Dirrell and Dirrell walked through the shots, when Dirrell landed cleanly Froch started to do the chicken dance.......
I think that points to a Dirrell KO in the rematch.....
A demon in my belly
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
[quote=Fenster;799670]I'm saying if Froch had hit him he may have hurt him. Trust me.[
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.
Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.
So froch hits so hard, even when he doesnt hit his opponent the wind from his fist going by creates a percussion that shocks his opponents??...Is that what you are saying?
Frosh landed cleanly on Dirrell and Dirrell walked through the shots, when Dirrell landed cleanly Froch started to do the chicken dance.......
I think that points to a Dirrell KO in the rematch.....
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Una mas semana
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
Great video, still doesn't explain what Froch did to win, but great video.
Are you going to show another that counts rabbit punches?
Of course the judges aren't there to count clinches, that's the refs job.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
For sure - if someone makes one.Great video, still doesn't explain what Froch did to win, but great video.
Are you going to show another that counts rabbit punches?
Of course the judges aren't there to count clinches, that's the refs job.
Remember I think Dirrell WON!!!
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
The violent dark side
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
I agree that direll deseved to loose but not because he was beat, but because when you let it go to the cards you take it out of your hands and put it into the hands of people who you have no idea what their real intentions are. Props to froch cause the scoreboard is all that matters. But me and a couple of guys watched the fight again with no sound (an idea i got from nate cambell) and i'm no expert but the fight in that way didn't even look close. Direll runs, mayweather uses elbows, bradley his head, margarito cement basically i'm sayin you can't take away punches landed from a guy for the way he lands them. It should be like a video game a point is a point. So those saying direll lost and should have cause of the way he fought out there, i have to disagree. Why even keep score if we are going to get results like this. But hey if froch can keep winning and win this whole thing it won't matter how, it's all about the scoreboard after. If this were a street fight then i'd say maybe froch did enough to make it even, but who was the best boxer in this sport called boxing, no way he won.
Last edited by Mar; 10-19-2009 at 01:20 PM.
Hidden Content Click clack ! Give up the purse.........or yetti will find you.
28-0-0 12KOs
Array
Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.
Dirrell ran and clinched but still managed to outland Froch and outthrow Froch in majority of the rounds.
Froch landed about three clean punches the whole night, although he did land alot of rabbit punches, unforenately for Froch, they are illegal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks