Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 91

Thread: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2440
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    I've just watched the fight. I didn't see a blatant robbery, but I thought Dirrell definitely won the fight. I scored it 115-113 (including the bullshit point decuction) Dirrell was very frustrating because I feel he could've won every round if he had've stopped the leaning and holding and just relied on his skill and ability. He'll be back!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,786
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3637
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    I've just watched the fight. I didn't see a blatant robbery, but I thought Dirrell definitely won the fight. I scored it 115-113 (including the bullshit point decuction) Dirrell was very frustrating because I feel he could've won every round if he had've stopped the leaning and holding and just relied on his skill and ability. He'll be back!
    This is a fair assessment, and about what I have after rewatching it in good quality. Again, factoring in the rediculous pt deduction. And I emphasize that because it really was. You don't ref a fight like that then all of a sudden knock off a pt. when there were so many blatant potential pt deductions coming from Froch also. If you're going to let it be rough and a bit dirty and play out that way, fair enough. Let them go.

    And even then, scoring it as such, I was really looking to give Froch a round or 2 that were close.

    Final assessment of both fighters:

    Dirrell can improve a lot, and use this as a learning tool. he could easily have boxed the ears off of Froch, but did fight too safe. If he can find a good balance of defence and ultilizing that speed for offence, he will be much more dangerous.

    Froch. Meh. I dunno. I really didn't have any thoughts on him going in. But there isn't a lot there to improve on. His whole thing is, lets get close and bang and see what happens. Well, boxing is more then that. And he is going to get exposed for it. In that kind of battle, and with slick fighters. This may not have been his best performance, and Dirells game likely did make him look worse then he is, but overall, he is a very limited fighter.
    Last edited by Youngblood; 10-19-2009 at 11:28 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1147
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Froch doesnt use the upper cut anymore because if you throw an upper cut the way Froch does against a top 5 SMW Froch will be the one staring up at the lights.....
    PETA = People Eating Tasty Animals
    The only Acceptable Gun Control Law: Always use two hands when firing.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3134
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    The greatly respected Graham Houston agrees with Fenster.

    DEBATABLE YES, ROBBERY NO: Carl Froch W12 (split) Andre Dirrell | FightWriter

    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    LOL at "Dirrell looked shaky from the shots Froch nearly landed", actually very true, he is a bit of a head case.

    I have to say I've found Bilbo's general epiphany about Froch kind of humorous. He looks the same as he's always looked.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    this actually might have been a robbery. Its about time.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3134
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    LOL at "Dirrell looked shaky from the shots Froch nearly landed", actually very true, he is a bit of a head case.

    I have to say I've found Bilbo's general epiphany about Froch kind of humorous. He looks the same as he's always looked.


    I thought that was funny too. I'm disappointed with amat.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-13-2008, 09:17 PM
  2. Brock & Tim Got What They Deserved!
    By Magickstricks13 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-11-2008, 05:01 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-08-2007, 02:54 AM
  4. Got what they deserved!
    By motorcitycobra in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-13-2007, 05:05 AM
  5. This was a well deserved draw.
    By BABABOOEY in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 05-22-2006, 07:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing