Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

[Hunter]

[quote=Fenster;799587][
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.

Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.

So froch hits so hard, even when he doesnt hit his opponent the wind from his fist going by creates a percussion that shocks his opponents??...Is that what you are saying?



Frosh landed cleanly on Dirrell and Dirrell walked through the shots, when Dirrell landed cleanly Froch started to do the chicken dance.......

I think that points to a Dirrell KO in the rematch.....

[Fenster]

[QUOTE=Hunter;799665]

[
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.

Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.

So froch hits so hard, even when he doesnt hit his opponent the wind from his fist going by creates a percussion that shocks his opponents??...Is that what you are saying?



Frosh landed cleanly on Dirrell and Dirrell walked through the shots, when Dirrell landed cleanly Froch started to do the chicken dance.......

I think that points to a Dirrell KO in the rematch.....

I'm saying if Froch had hit him he may have hurt him. Trust me.

[Hunter]

[quote=Fenster;799670]

[
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.

Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.

So froch hits so hard, even when he doesnt hit his opponent the wind from his fist going by creates a percussion that shocks his opponents??...Is that what you are saying?



Frosh landed cleanly on Dirrell and Dirrell walked through the shots, when Dirrell landed cleanly Froch started to do the chicken dance.......


I think that points to a Dirrell KO in the rematch.....

I'm saying if Froch had hit him he may have hurt him. Trust me.

Sorry - I cant trust you on this one even if you are the former Saddo Prediction Comp Champion-FACT.......Froch did land cleanly on Dirrell and Froch's punches didnt hurt dirrell. I saw it with my own two eyes.....When Dirrell landed to Froch's noggin, he started to stagger around like a high schooler after doing his first beer bong...

[BIG H]

[quote=Fenster;799670]

[
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.

Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.

So froch hits so hard, even when he doesnt hit his opponent the wind from his fist going by creates a percussion that shocks his opponents??...Is that what you are saying?



Frosh landed cleanly on Dirrell and Dirrell walked through the shots, when Dirrell landed cleanly Froch started to do the chicken dance.......

I think that points to a Dirrell KO in the rematch.....

I'm saying if Froch had hit him he may have hurt him. Trust me.

[Howlin Mad Missy]

[quote=Fenster;799670]

[
You're not grasping the importance of the mindset in these matters.

Yes Froch never hit Dirrell. But the ones that got close clearly bothered him.

So froch hits so hard, even when he doesnt hit his opponent the wind from his fist going by creates a percussion that shocks his opponents??...Is that what you are saying?



Frosh landed cleanly on Dirrell and Dirrell walked through the shots, when Dirrell landed cleanly Froch started to do the chicken dance.......

I think that points to a Dirrell KO in the rematch.....

I'm saying if Froch had hit him he may have hurt him. Trust me.

[Fenster]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fztqCbOUiTY

[killersheep]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fztqCbOUiTY

Great video, still doesn't explain what Froch did to win, but great video.

Are you going to show another that counts rabbit punches?

Of course the judges aren't there to count clinches, that's the refs job.

[Fenster]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fztqCbOUiTY

Great video, still doesn't explain what Froch did to win, but great video.

Are you going to show another that counts rabbit punches?

Of course the judges aren't there to count clinches, that's the refs job.

For sure - if someone makes one.

Remember I think Dirrell WON!!!

[josef4334]

i think both deserved to lose. direll would have picked froch apart but he chose to run and hug and when he was landing his punches he would stop and hug. i mean come on.. he was trying to play it safe like a scared little girl. froch on the other hand didnt pressure like he's supposed to. bottomline is that both of them belong to the bottom of the super six along with taylor.

[Mar]

I agree that direll deseved to loose but not because he was beat, but because when you let it go to the cards you take it out of your hands and put it into the hands of people who you have no idea what their real intentions are. Props to froch cause the scoreboard is all that matters. But me and a couple of guys watched the fight again with no sound (an idea i got from nate cambell) and i'm no expert but the fight in that way didn't even look close. Direll runs, mayweather uses elbows, bradley his head, margarito cement basically i'm sayin you can't take away punches landed from a guy for the way he lands them. It should be like a video game a point is a point. So those saying direll lost and should have cause of the way he fought out there, i have to disagree. Why even keep score if we are going to get results like this. But hey if froch can keep winning and win this whole thing it won't matter how, it's all about the scoreboard after. If this were a street fight then i'd say maybe froch did enough to make it even, but who was the best boxer in this sport called boxing, no way he won.

[Pugilistic]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fztqCbOUiTY

Dirrell ran and clinched but still managed to outland Froch and outthrow Froch in majority of the rounds.

Froch landed about three clean punches the whole night, although he did land alot of rabbit punches, unforenately for Froch, they are illegal.