Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

[Mar]

I agree that direll deseved to loose but not because he was beat, but because when you let it go to the cards you take it out of your hands and put it into the hands of people who you have no idea what their real intentions are. Props to froch cause the scoreboard is all that matters. But me and a couple of guys watched the fight again with no sound (an idea i got from nate cambell) and i'm no expert but the fight in that way didn't even look close. Direll runs, mayweather uses elbows, bradley his head, margarito cement basically i'm sayin you can't take away punches landed from a guy for the way he lands them. It should be like a video game a point is a point. So those saying direll lost and should have cause of the way he fought out there, i have to disagree. Why even keep score if we are going to get results like this. But hey if froch can keep winning and win this whole thing it won't matter how, it's all about the scoreboard after. If this were a street fight then i'd say maybe froch did enough to make it even, but who was the best boxer in this sport called boxing, no way he won.