Would this produce more action in fights?

[HattonTheHammer]

not particularly

the extra incentive to win would just be cancelled out by you losing an extra 5-10% if you were knocked out.

Lets say for instance this was used when floyd and hatton fought. Instead of ricky coming out in the 10th and trying his upmost to knock his man out knowing it was his only chance of victory he might of just decided that it wasnt worth losing the extra money for and completely going into his shell for 3rounds!!

[Snakey]

not particularly

the extra incentive to win would just be cancelled out by you losing an extra 5-10% if you were knocked out.

Lets say for instance this was used when floyd and hatton fought. Instead of ricky coming out in the 10th and trying his upmost to knock his man out knowing it was his only chance of victory he might of just decided that it wasnt worth losing the extra money for and completely going into his shell for 3rounds!!

No no no, youve got my idea wrong. They dont lose money, they have to win to gain money. They are only guarenteed say for example 100 000 to turn up and fight, if they win they get 250 000 total so an extra 150 000 for winning. This would make them want to win so they can get the extra money, otherwise they are stuck with the 100 000.

[Fenster]

Without doubt it would make more exciting fights.

Imagine winner takes all matches. It would be awesome.

[Spicoli]

Winner take all....save for cab fare back to the hotel.Fewer TV dates for defeated,less cushy network contracts.

[killersheep]

I know Jones has pushed for this in negotiations before, I think it's a great idea. Another thing that I really like in that MMA does is offer a "fight of the night bonus". I think if the "Fight of the Night" bonus went to both the winner and loser of the most exciting fight, you could possibly have fewer skating to the finish situations

[Snakey]

I know Jones has pushed for this in negotiations before, I think it's a great idea. Another thing that I really like in that MMA does is offer a "fight of the night bonus". I think if the "Fight of the Night" bonus went to both the winner and loser of the most exciting fight, you could possibly have fewer skating to the finish situations

I originally started thinking about this when I heard about the UFC bonuses. I think they have the same policy where the winner gets extra. I guess it wouldnt even matter if they were on equal money or not, they could have that the winner gets 50% extra or something which would be enough to make anyone want to try their ass off to win instead of coasting.

[awdleyfuturehalloffamer]

don't forget about the corrupt judging if ever a fight went to decision.

[Andre]

Winner takes all could be very viable in any fight, if the fighters themselves make a side bet against each others purses and sign their own legal document with two witnesses.

Do that out in front of the cameras and everyone is into it there would be no backing out either.

I cant make out fighters who mouth off to everyone about this and that and how they want extra cause they reckon they are the better fighter and the better draw card; yet they wont back their own words and put their own purse up to the fighter they are bagging on.

[HattonTheHammer]

Without doubt it would make more exciting fights.

Imagine winner takes all matches. It would be awesome.

never happen in a million years

at domestic level a fighters purse is his income and way of continuing in the sport. At world level theres too much at stake for the fighters entire team both training and promotional for anyone to ever agree to a winner takes all contest.

I like the idea i really do, just isnt viable is it?