Re: my take on froch-dirrell

Originally Posted by
Youngblood
I think I am going to have to chalk this one up as a learning experience for myself. In how differently a fight can be perceived. For I have watched it 3 times now, scored it 3 times, and even trying to give Froch the close rounds and the pt deduction, still have him down by 2.
And I see some people who I think are batshit crazy or biased blindly scoring to Froch, but others whom I respect for opinons also giving it close to Froch. So I guess it really is a perspective deal (even though mine is the correct one

). So yea, w/e. Onward we go.
Hattonthehammer, guess where you fit in in that deal.

ha ha, i know mate
This is very hop-calzaghe esque - ugly fight that you should really score for the guy attempting to engage a fight and throwing the better punches yet end up scoring the round to the guy that was able to dodge everything due to his reluctance and land cleanly every time due to the fact the guy he is fighting doesnt at any point expect his man to be active.
As ive said neither guy comes away from this with much credit. Froch was made to look far inferior than what he was built up to be while dirrell is officially the ugliest fighter to enter a boxing ring. Not even gatti or duran could engage andre dirrell in a fight.
Dont want to and hope i dont have to see andre dirrell fight again, horrible fighter
Where carl is concerned i just hope for his sake he left that performance in the gym as had that of been mikkel kessler in with him it would of been a short night for him!!
one dangerous horrible bloke
Bookmarks