Scores from Froch-Dirrell !!!

[LukeH]

each to their own dirrell came on nicely towards the end of the round and landed some crisp shots. But he also had to take some in the process and while it was pretty much the only time he tried to trade with froch it was evident he was asserting pressure through lunging all over a precise froch instead of actually throwing the cleaner punches.

Yes, he took some in the process, but in that round he DEFINITELY gave out more. You don't score it for Froch just because he managed to connect once or twice, Dirrell bossed the whole round. Froch still was barely landing, you cannot call it precise, the one throwing & landing the cleaner punches was the guy who staggered his opponent at the end of the round (hint - it wasn't Froch).

As said each to their own

It wasnt by no means a resounding round and the only positive to come out from it was the decisive and totally just point deduction for dirrell that came 4-5rounds to late to actually get a fight going

My goodness. I'm from Nottingham and would class myself as a Froch fan, probably a biased one at that, but he cleary should have lost. Your constant, dilusional love of British boxers is unbearable.

[Pugilistic]

Dirrell got robbed.

Froch won 4 rounds at most.

[Saddo]

here is the original scorecards from the night...

[Fenster]

here is the original scorecards from the night...

Notice on that scorecard the 1 point deduction hasn't been taken from the 10th round?

All three judges still had to score the round with a 10 (even though that looks like the master scorekeepers card). The point deductions are taken afterwards.

CutMeMick? You're just about the only person who would understand what i'm waffling about.

I told ya so

[blegit]

I stopped talking about this debacle when I saw one judge gave Froch the 11th round.

[Mar]

They should have just called thier scores in and saved froch and direll the wear and tear on thier bodies.