Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
This is a very good thread idea, good stuff Bilbo!

There are some very enticing names on that list. I would have to say Floyd Mayweather above all the others because I find him to be such a grotesque individual. He has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. There can be no doubting his abilities as a fighter, but he likes to cherry pick and whenever he opens his mouth I get the tremendous urge to hit him on the head with a traffic cone.

All this 'money' Mayweather rubbish just grates and I would like to see him truly humbled.
Where as someone like Carl Froch has??

Floyd doesn't have any redeeming qualities does he? - He's not got any boxing ability, he doesn't give to charity, he doesn't make time for his fans or try to help his community with the money he earns. What a "grotesque" individual indeed.

If you're talking zero redeeming qualities and based your vote on that - Surely Mr Froch would get the vote all day long? Arrogance for no apparent reason, disrespect and awful boxing.

Guess who I voted.
Yes, Froch too. Knock 'em all out I say.

Don't take my words too seriously in threads like this. The tongue is partly in cheek when I get all verbose and utter things like "no redeeming qualities whatsoever". It's an absurd thing to say as most people surely have something good about them somewhere. I do dislike the way Floyd comes across though, I can't deny that.