Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: Dawson would beat Kessler

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    330
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    829
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dawson would beat Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by sumkalambay View Post
    on another forum u dumbshit.

    if kessler is an "ultra effective" technician, then what do you make of guys like vernon forrest and marco antonio barrera who aren't even considered first-tier technicians?

    if u think kessler is a technician, your standard for what makes a technician is atrociously low.
    Wait Wait... are you saying Kessler is not a very solid technician here? If do, you didn't watch none of his fights; you can remove whatever you want from the guy but 2 things: Extremely solid technician and damn hard hands. NO. HE IS a fierce technician.
    name me a technician who didn't know how to in-fight.

    kalambay was a technician. hopkins is a technician. donald curry was a superb technician. calzaghe's a technician, despite how unorthodox(and many times sloppy) he looks. kessler isn't.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1073
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dawson would beat Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by sumkalambay View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by sumkalambay View Post
    on another forum u dumbshit.

    if kessler is an "ultra effective" technician, then what do you make of guys like vernon forrest and marco antonio barrera who aren't even considered first-tier technicians?

    if u think kessler is a technician, your standard for what makes a technician is atrociously low.
    Wait Wait... are you saying Kessler is not a very solid technician here? If do, you didn't watch none of his fights; you can remove whatever you want from the guy but 2 things: Extremely solid technician and damn hard hands. NO. HE IS a fierce technician.
    name me a technician who didn't know how to in-fight.

    kalambay was a technician. hopkins is a technician. donald curry was a superb technician. calzaghe's a technician, despite how unorthodox(and many times sloppy) he looks. kessler isn't.
    YOu haven't looked at Kessler fight and it is obvious. His head movements are perfect, his jab is one of the best around, his guard is stiff and he has excellent hook and uppercut, I do not see any arguments why he isn't good, hell, most specialists even see him winning the 6 men tournament, the guy's no fluke at all, you can hate him but it is not a reason to become irrational.
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Montreal/Canada
    Posts
    644
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1225
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dawson would beat Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by sumkalambay View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post

    Wait Wait... are you saying Kessler is not a very solid technician here? If do, you didn't watch none of his fights; you can remove whatever you want from the guy but 2 things: Extremely solid technician and damn hard hands. NO. HE IS a fierce technician.
    name me a technician who didn't know how to in-fight.

    kalambay was a technician. hopkins is a technician. donald curry was a superb technician. calzaghe's a technician, despite how unorthodox(and many times sloppy) he looks. kessler isn't.
    YOu haven't looked at Kessler fight and it is obvious. His head movements are perfect, his jab is one of the best around, his guard is stiff and he has excellent hook and uppercut, I do not see any arguments why he isn't good, hell, most specialists even see him winning the 6 men tournament, the guy's no fluke at all, you can hate him but it is not a reason to become irrational.
    I agree with all you said about Kessler and he’s one of the fighters that I like Nameless, but I rate Dawson a bit higher.
    IMO BCD version that beat Adamek can beat any SM or LHW, Hopkins inclusive.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1073
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dawson would beat Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by iwng100 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by sumkalambay View Post

    name me a technician who didn't know how to in-fight.

    kalambay was a technician. hopkins is a technician. donald curry was a superb technician. calzaghe's a technician, despite how unorthodox(and many times sloppy) he looks. kessler isn't.
    YOu haven't looked at Kessler fight and it is obvious. His head movements are perfect, his jab is one of the best around, his guard is stiff and he has excellent hook and uppercut, I do not see any arguments why he isn't good, hell, most specialists even see him winning the 6 men tournament, the guy's no fluke at all, you can hate him but it is not a reason to become irrational.
    I agree with all you said about Kessler and he’s one of the fighters that I like Nameless, but I rate Dawson a bit higher.
    IMO BCD version that beat Adamek can beat any SM or LHW, Hopkins inclusive.
    I have no problems with somebody thinking Dawson is superior, that's all a matter of brainstorming and making hypothesis and Dawson is not a bad boxer at all so though I think Kessler would make it, I wouldn't argue vehemently against it if just voicing that I think Kessler, in my opinion, i better. But to say that Kessler is not technical is all another thing and I just can't agree with that.
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    330
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    829
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dawson would beat Kessler

    some of you aren't getting the difference between a textbook fighter and being a technician.

    arguello was textbook and a technician.

    someone who's as incompetent as kessler is at IN-FIGHTING can't possibly be called a technician.

    i guess it depends on how u define that term.
    Last edited by sumkalambay; 11-11-2009 at 02:57 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1261
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dawson would beat Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by sumkalambay View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by sumkalambay View Post
    on another forum u dumbshit.

    if kessler is an "ultra effective" technician, then what do you make of guys like vernon forrest and marco antonio barrera who aren't even considered first-tier technicians?

    if u think kessler is a technician, your standard for what makes a technician is atrociously low.
    Wait Wait... are you saying Kessler is not a very solid technician here? If do, you didn't watch none of his fights; you can remove whatever you want from the guy but 2 things: Extremely solid technician and damn hard hands. NO. HE IS a fierce technician.
    name me a technician who didn't know how to in-fight.

    kalambay was a technician. hopkins is a technician. donald curry was a superb technician. calzaghe's a technician, despite how unorthodox(and many times sloppy) he looks. kessler isn't.
    Comparing Kessler to the likes of Hopkins and Calzaghe is unfair.

    What made Hopkins and Calzaghe so great was their ability to fight coming forward or on the backfoot effectively.

    From what i've seen from Kessler, he is most effective boxing behind his jab and using his jab to set up his strong fast right hand or putting combos together.

    Kessler is the perfect example of a conventional boxer, he is well rounded, good jab, solid defense, uses his footwork effective, dangerous hard right hand, solid left hook and uppercut, is good at putting punches together. He also has surprisingly good handspeed plus good power especially with his right hand.

    Overall Kessler is a good technician.

    Only GREAT technicians can fight inside and outside effectively.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Can Chad Dawson beat Joe Calzaghe?
    By boricua in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 01-30-2009, 03:16 AM
  2. Calzaghe says Kessler would beat Pavlik-him too...
    By nebraskaheat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-18-2008, 06:58 PM
  3. Kessler will beat JC with 1 hand says WBC boss
    By littlebif in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-22-2007, 08:34 AM
  4. Should Kessler beat Beyer and Unify
    By jangeorg in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 07-11-2006, 12:21 AM
  5. Who will finally beat Mikkel Kessler?
    By El Kabong in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 07-01-2006, 10:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing