why the hate

[JazMerkin]

why the hate for david haye, especially the few british lads on here givin him stick. i thought he fought the perfect fight, yeah it was boring, but he did what he had too do, those on here that say valuev won it are absolutely crazy. a boxing fight first and foremost is scored on shots landed, that is the primary scoring system(check the rules) and aggresion and all that shit is secondary.but first and foremost its shots landed. haye outland valuev easily, and scored the most eye catching punches, yeah haye was on the back foot, but how else did u expect haye too beat valuev, ive sat silently for a while just wathing peoples posts about the fight, and people who i thought knew boxing that are sayin valuev won the fight must not no shit, not naming names. haye won that fight with ease, he made valuev look so ordinary its unreal(which we no he is,many have tried and most have failed). i no now that im gonna get some mixed replies from this thread, but im more than happy too answer, WELL DONE DAVID HAYE, WE NEED A FIGHTER LIKE U FOR THE SAKE OF THE HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION, GOD BLESS U

See Paddy here's the problem I have, I remembered you writing a similar thread about a month back after the Froch fight where you argued the opposite. Do you feel a need to do this every time someone doesn't score with patriotism as you appear to suggest to Bilbo here?

seriously bilbo why the hate for haye, what is ur nationality

I've said it a number of times, but I can't see how someone could be saying that Froch won based on Dirrell's negativity & then not give Valuev rounds when Haye was being negative. I thought both Haye & Dirrell won based on how we score rounds in boxing, but I simply can't see the justification in one & not the other. Granted the rounds were not the same exact rounds, but there were similar patterns & if you scored a round for Froch for being aggressive, the same should of been done for Valuev.