HBO`s calling of dawson-johnson II

[Violent Demise]

Ok if like myself the events earlier in the evening were simply not enough for a die hard you would of stayed up to the very early hours of sunday morning to watch a very dull contest between chad dawson and glen johnson.

What was served up was 10 rounds of very tactical exchanges with 9 & 12 briefly producing the odd moment of excitement to the very bored and frustrated fans in attendance.

At the time of the fight the only way possible for me to make it to 5-5.30am is by listening to very loud music and of course a 6pack of brewskis. In real time it was evidently clear that bad chad was throwing the far cleaner punches through 8 rounds and all bar the odd round or 2 had a comfortable enough lead going into the last 4. At the end of the round glen johnson was clearly told in no uncertain terms to go to work and really rough up chad. He did so and took 3 of the last 4 rounds, still not enough......a very close 115-113 chad dawson or somewhere along those lines right?

Not according to the morons at HBO who led by an over zealous lederman scorecard made it seem as if the fight was a non starter.

Let me make this perfectly clear. If you did indeed in the very words of jim lampley had glen johnson "losing 10-12 rounds" you are either....

A-An unknowlegable dick with no sense of how a boxing contest is scored and therefore just chose to go along with the commentators

B-An actual fight fan who is a borderline retard completely unable to comprehend and break down a fight scenario **cough**(elterriblemorales)**cough**cough**(viole nt demise)**cough**cough**(amat)




ps:i really do have a nasty throat infection at the moment and the discretions above i assure you are genuine

Stop swallowing so much male reproductive organ and maybe you won't have that problem.

I had it 8 rounds to 4 Dawson

[ICB]

I thought they were biased towards Chad Dawson, but who really cares it wasn't a close fight. Chad Dawson comfortably won by 4 rounds maybe even more, Glen Johnson could not get his gameplan working at all. Chad Dawson fought a smart/professional fight. I thought he was a bit too cautious at times, but he still didn't leave any question marks.

I mean didn't everyone want Chad Dawson to beat Glen Johnson convincingly, and didn't he just do that ? i mean i know Glen Johnson isn't no spring chicken. But he's still an elite fighter, and no one has beaten Glen Johnson that convincingly since probably Bernard Hopkins in 1997, and Glen Johnson probably hadn't hit his peak yet then either.

[TitoFan]

I'd rather watch paint dry than to see Glen Johnson fight.
(Not that he isn't a nice guy, of course).