Quote Originally Posted by omegapoint
That scenario is highly improbable but possible. But it has no relevance to this particular fight.
Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote Originally Posted by omegapoint
I deal in facts.

The purpose in a boxing match is for a fighter to hit his opponent more than his opponent hits him.

The fighter who accomplishes that objective wins the fight. That is an obvious fact.

Unfortunately, the fighter who wins the fight doesn't always get the decision because of politics, bias, incompetency, and downright corruption.

Because Winky Wright hit Taylor at least 50 times more than Taylor hit him, Winky Wright easily won the fight; and in a perfect world Winky Wright WOULD HAVE WON THE DECISION AND WOULD NOW BE MIDDLEWEIGHT CHAMPION OF THE WORLD.







I see. Explain this little 4 round scenario. Fighter A wins rounds 1, 3, and 4 over fighter B. In round 1 fighter A outlands fighter B, 45 to 38. In round 3 it's 44 to 35. In round 4 it's 50 to 41. In round 2 the only round won by fighter B he outlands fighter A 57 to 30. Final punch stats favor Fighter B 171 to 169. Does that mean he should win the fight eventhough he only won one round?
that's the same thing that many said in the taylor-hop fight...is it possible to outland your opponent and lose? when it's jermain taylor? Three times in row now...so yes..if you're jermain taylor you can thorw more & land less than you're opponent and still win as he proven in three fights although in this fight it was draw..but it just feels like they robbed wink...