Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 85

Thread: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Oakland, California, USA
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Well first of all this is not an anti-pac thread. I feel Pac would of done the same at 147. I just don't see how he could have won the 147 title at 145.. Usually when a boxer comes 1 or 2 pounds under the limit the titles are not on the line. Which leads me to my question.. What are the rules, can you fight for the 147 title at 140 ? First of all catchweights suck but to be able to win titles at heavier weights without fighting at them is B/S... This opens up all possibilities...
    It's not called 147 belt. It's called a welterweight title. Welterweight is anywhere from 141-147. The fight was negotiated at 145, so it's a welterweight fight. If you go over 147, it's called over weight!!! Got it kid?
    lol stfu you pac nut hugger... 147 is the minimum WELTER WEIGHT LIMIT not the LIGHT welter or SUPER lightweight.. if that is the case let's eliminate LIGHT and SUPER and just have a 10 pound divison class.... got it kid?
    147 is the maximum at welter Stupid!!!

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1324
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    You don't have to weigh in at the exact weight for the fight to be a title fight. Anybody under 147 can fight for that title
    Sure, but in this case Miguel wasn't allowed to weigh anything over 145, so it really wasn't a WW fight. Of course he agreed to all the terms and the belt means nothing in such a big fight, but it's still a bit hokey how it was sanctioned as a WW title defense imo.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    375
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post

    It's not called 147 belt. It's called a welterweight title. Welterweight is anywhere from 141-147. The fight was negotiated at 145, so it's a welterweight fight. If you go over 147, it's called over weight!!! Got it kid?
    lol stfu you pac nut hugger... 147 is the minimum WELTER WEIGHT LIMIT not the LIGHT welter or SUPER lightweight.. if that is the case let's eliminate LIGHT and SUPER and just have a 10 pound divison class.... got it kid?
    147 is the maximum at welter Stupid!!!
    It's the 147 title you fucking moron
    Last edited by purtyboy; 11-18-2009 at 08:54 PM.
    Hidden Content There is no reward for second place

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    You don't have to weigh in at the exact weight for the fight to be a title fight. Anybody under 147 can fight for that title

    Exactly. Barney Ross defended his welterweight title weighing 142 pounds while his challenger Henry Armstrong weighed 133 1/2 pounds. The only thing I remember about the weight is that they made Armstrong gain a few pounds to make it not look like a featherweight champion was challenging for the 147 pound title, which Armstrong was.
    Formerly LuciferTheGreat

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2536
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    all right, lets keep this one on the main board


    I just ignore the belts for the most part personally

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1697
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post

    lol stfu you pac nut hugger... 147 is the minimum WELTER WEIGHT LIMIT not the LIGHT welter or SUPER lightweight.. if that is the case let's eliminate LIGHT and SUPER and just have a 10 pound divison class.... got it kid?
    147 is the maximum at welter Stupid!!!
    It's the 147 title you fucking moron that is why i said MINIMUM ofcourse it's the maximum aswell!
    Sorry, he's right. The minimum would be anything over 140.1lbs. The maximum is 147lbs on the dot.

    If you could only weigh 147lbs, then Cotto wouldn't have been the champion because he weighed less for his last 2 fights.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Well first of all this is not an anti-pac thread. I feel Pac would of done the same at 147. I just don't see how he could have won the 147 title at 145.. ..
    The amount of times iv seen this stupid question!!!

    Anyone fighting between 140lbs and 147lbs is a fuucking welterweight!!

    Thats how!!

    Cotto could defend his title at 141lbs if he wanted

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Miguel wasn't allowed to weigh anything over 145, so it really wasn't a WW fight. .
    What was it then for fuuck sakes!! A heavyweight fight?

    145lb is between 140 and 147, so its a fuucking welterweight fight!!

    Cotto is the One stupid enough to agree to come in a whole 2lb lighter than need be

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1302
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by purtyboy View Post
    Well first of all this is not an anti-pac thread. I feel Pac would of done the same at 147. I just don't see how he could have won the 147 title at 145.. Usually when a boxer comes 1 or 2 pounds under the limit the titles are not on the line. Which leads me to my question.. What are the rules, can you fight for the 147 title at 140 ? First of all catchweights suck but to be able to win titles at heavier weights without fighting at them is B/S... This opens up all possibilities...
    It's not called 147 belt. It's called a welterweight title. Welterweight is anywhere from 141-147. The fight was negotiated at 145, so it's a welterweight fight. If you go over 147, it's called over weight!!! Got it kid?
    lol stfu you pac nut hugger... 147 is the minimum WELTER WEIGHT LIMIT not the LIGHT welter or SUPER lightweight.. if that is the case let's eliminate LIGHT and SUPER and just have a 10 pound divison class.... got it kid?
    I don't see the point in catchweights either, but I think you're sort of both right. The weight limit for a welterweight fight is at 147, but the welterweight division by definition is anywhere between 141 and 147. Isn't a fight between A and B at 145 technically is a welterweight fight?

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1250
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    To be fair,

    147 is the limit for a welterweight fight which means anything between 141 and 147 is a legit welterweight fight.

    People can't discredit Pacquiao for making Cotto come down two pounds being that Pacquiao is a very small welterweight and Cotto is a legit welter.

    Cotto looked in great shape at 145 so no excuses.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    905
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    So for anyone who hasn't got it yet:

    A welterweight fight is for anyone 147 or less.

    Cotto was daft/ desperate enough to fight Manny to agree to have a 145 maximum for this fight. Had he had better negotiators or even cared then he could have weighed at anything up to 147.

    The fact is Manny was a big money match and to do the fight he had to agree to his terms.

    And yes a super flyweight could fight a heavyweight for their title.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    905
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Plus 2lbs is neither here nor there. You can shit 2lbs!

    I've always though that anything within a few lbs wouldn't make all that much difference. But then havin nver boxed at a decent standard I may be a bit naive.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1697
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by 0james0 View Post
    So for anyone who hasn't got it yet:

    A welterweight fight is for anyone 147 or less.

    Cotto was daft/ desperate enough to fight Manny to agree to have a 145 maximum for this fight. Had he had better negotiators or even cared then he could have weighed at anything up to 147.

    The fact is Manny was a big money match and to do the fight he had to agree to his terms.

    And yes a super flyweight could fight a heavyweight for their title.
    Nowadays I don't think that's still possible, I think there was a ruling in the late 80s that you had to also meet the minimum weight requirements to fight for a title. Might have been around the time of the Leonard-Duran rubber match.

    As for the lb issue, when you have to make weight, it's those last few lbs that get you. I'm not saying this is the case with Cotto, but I think if it was say Mosley, then cutting down to 145 now would be very difficult for him. It all depends on what each individual's limit is.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    You could both be 108 lbs and still fight for the WW title , HW title for that matter .
    Dont forget Ray Leonard fought Donny LaLonde at a catch weight , for both the WBC LHW and WBC SM titles , so he could beat Tommy Hearns to 5 tiltes at 5 weights.
    Its bullshit , but its the way it is .

    You have to be at least one weight class under in order to compete for the title. This is what Lederman said when Roy was moving up to challenge Ruiz....


    But as far as pac goes...WW is 140-147 so pac was a WW. But not allowing Cotto to weigh the extra two pounds was bullshit. Not that it would have changed.
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is it possible to win a 147 title belt below the welterweight limit?

    the sanctioning board have nothing to do with the contract.

    If there had been no contract and they both weighed in at 145, no issue.

    If cotto had weighed in at 147 and manny at 145, then the fight would still have been sanctioned as a ww title fight.

    on the case of a fly going for a hw title, i think you are technically correct but think that whoever is the medical team granting the license would refuse to allow it, idue to the danger faced by the lighter man.

    that being said i swear years ago i heard a rumour of naseem wearing lead in his shorts so he weighed more for some fights. perhaps i just made that up. anycase he certainly doesnt need to do that now!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!
    By Pavlik in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 194
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 01:32 AM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 03:55 PM
  3. The OTHER Welterweight title fight this weekend!!
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-10-2007, 05:50 PM
  4. 7/14/07 Cintron vs. Matthysse *IBF Welterweight title*
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-26-2007, 10:00 PM
  5. 10 Best Welterweight Title Fights Since 1981
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-14-2006, 08:02 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing