Catch Weights?

[Nameless]

Catch weights can be interesting, never for a belt though, the idea to have such for a class of weight that doesn't exist is plain stupid. Next belt they will create; the regular belt championship for those who normally fight catchweight and wins very often in the regular categories

[Gandalf]

I don't really see the point in catchweights. If you aren't able to make the weights that we have then you should stay in the divisions you are most comfortable in. In the most recent instances, Mayweather never even bothered to make the weight and there was no reason Cotto/Pac could not have been at 147.

Catchweights just add a murky element to boxing that I am not all that comfortable with. I like a fight and for there to be no questions asked about the merits of the winner.

[brocktonblockbust]

I don't really see the point in catchweights. If you aren't able to make the weights that we have then you should stay in the divisions you are most comfortable in. In the most recent instances, Mayweather never even bothered to make the weight and there was no reason Cotto/Pac could not have been at 147.

Catchweights just add a murky element to boxing that I am not all that comfortable with. I like a fight and for there to be no questions asked about the merits of the winner.

@ Gandalf

Murky?

[Beanz]

I don't really see the point in catchweights. If you aren't able to make the weights that we have then you should stay in the divisions you are most comfortable in. In the most recent instances, Mayweather never even bothered to make the weight and there was no reason Cotto/Pac could not have been at 147.

Catchweights just add a murky element to boxing that I am not all that comfortable with. I like a fight and for there to be no questions asked about the merits of the winner.

@ Gandalf

Murky?

Cloudy, discoloured not clear.

[Britkid]

Someone needs to explain how there is a catchweight title and who holds it, because by definition it cannot happen.

I suspect people do not know what catchweight means, which a few years ago on this forum what not be the case. Come on newbies, smarten up!

[Master]

Ban catch weights and everyone associated with them from boxing forever.

[Britkid]

Ban catch weights and everyone associated with them from boxing forever.

Small hall promoters need them desperately, they can keep a bill together if there is a late pull out. Plus there can be some cracking match ups.

I remember a Journeyman Cruiserweight coming in on same day notice to fight the unbeaten Light Heavyweight banger Nicky Piper... The then Adrian (Carl) Thompson won in a big upset and went on to have a stellar career.

That catchweight bout saved a TV date and helped to start to make a big future domestic name. And it did little long term harm to Piper either.

A young John Conteh fought quite a few heavyweights. It was a way of challenging his talent, but without the cost of bringing in expensive quality imports. And I think you will agree Conteh did not have too bad a career.

Catchweight matches will always be needed.

[brocktonblockbust]

ban catch weights and everyone associated with them from boxing forever.

this mofo is out of control

[Fenster]

Someone needs to explain how there is a catchweight title and who holds it, because by definition it cannot happen.

I suspect people do not know what catchweight means, which a few years ago on this forum what not be the case. Come on newbies, smarten up!

Anyone that knows anything about boxing knows catchweights are a modern phenomenon created by Manny Pacquiao.