Quote Originally Posted by mrtko
Quote Originally Posted by MRMANICK
My whole thing is that it seems like the standards for WINNING change everytime taylor fights which doesn't make any sense to me.Let me explain:

Taylor-Hopkins 1
Hes outlanded in total punches and in power punches.All the effective punches were landed by hopkins but they say he won the fight cause he was aggressive in the early rounds. I don't agree but i accept it.

Taylor-Hopkins 2
Hes outlanded again in total punches and power punches but this time he lands his jab more.That and the fact he was coming forward is what won the fight. once again i don't agree but must accept.

Taylor-Wright
Hes outlanded in total punches significantly (62) and hes outlanded in power punches by 1. Winky was the aggressor through out.Yes it looked like taylor landed the harder shots but i question there effectiveness considering wright was never down or wobbled. But all and all taylor was outlanded in almost every round. I don't see how can he be awarded for the harder shots if wink took it and keep coming forward landing more punches. Taylor spent 70% of the fight against the ropes.

All i'm saying is if taylor did enough to beat hop the first time then wright did more than enough to beat taylor this time. I just seems like taylor has been getting this veteran/champion benefit of the doubt even before he was champ. I just don't understand it.

P.S Jim Lampley was calling everything taylor threw a connect but the truth is taylor only lande those straight rights. Whenever he threw hooks they were blocked but lamp would scream as if they landed. He would barely call out when winky was landing.
Let me throw some hooks at you while you have it blocked and we'll see if that is effective or not. haha
Whats your point?