The Death Penalty

[Nameless]

Not entirely in favor in some regards.Not for the righteous god think side but because frankly its to easy a way for some of the lowest forms of humanity.Any man or woman can 'justify' an action that leads to taking of a life...it happens everyday but in some cases its all very cut and dry.Rape of children,murders and savagery done onto total innocence be they elderly or the youngest amongst us arrives at their own consequence.Have thought for a while that maybe the direct family of victims should be the deciding factor for a guiltys fate....though can they bare losing close family only to directly decide life or death of yet another.Many would seem to savor that call.Vigilante justice has to be prevalent,put yourself in someones shoes who loses a loved one.Very easy to become what you despise and detest in another,switch roles in an instant...some could live with that in a hope of finding "justice".Shit...need coffee

Get some and come back to this discussion

[ryanman]

Its terrible.

Sorry, really busy. But its terrible. I hate everyone that supports it. Bye.

[Master]

Its terrible.

Sorry, really busy. But its terrible. I hate everyone that supports it. Bye.

Thanks for your intellectual input. You can converted me.

[ryanman]

Sorry, Haven't got time to bore you all with a long essay, but i get the impression for most people its a question of which is the worst punishment between death and a life sentence.

Are there any other people who, like me, actually are against it because its too much of a punishment?

It seems that most people that are against it is for the reason that the offender would suffer more by being kept alive in prison serving a life sentence.

Is there anyone against it simply because its wrong?

[Howlin Mad Missy]

Sorry, Haven't got time to bore you all with a long essay, but i get the impression for most people its a question of which is the worst punishment between death and a life sentence.

Are there any other people who, like me, actually are against it because its too much of a punishment?

It seems that most people that are against it is for the reason that the offender would suffer more by being kept alive in prison serving a life sentence.

Is there anyone against it simply because its wrong?

yes, me.

Let's get this straight - we are teaching people it is wrong to kill by um, the state killing you. Sound logic, not a single flaw I can see, no not one.

[JazMerkin]

Sorry, Haven't got time to bore you all with a long essay, but i get the impression for most people its a question of which is the worst punishment between death and a life sentence.

Are there any other people who, like me, actually are against it because its too much of a punishment?

It seems that most people that are against it is for the reason that the offender would suffer more by being kept alive in prison serving a life sentence.

Is there anyone against it simply because its wrong?

yes, me.

Let's get this straight - we are teaching people it is wrong to kill by um, the state killing you. Sound logic, not a single flaw I can see, no not one.

I could write a long paragraph detailing my views, but that sentence said everything that needed to be said.

[Andre]

Sorry, Haven't got time to bore you all with a long essay, but i get the impression for most people its a question of which is the worst punishment between death and a life sentence.

Are there any other people who, like me, actually are against it because its too much of a punishment?

It seems that most people that are against it is for the reason that the offender would suffer more by being kept alive in prison serving a life sentence.

Is there anyone against it simply because its wrong?

Yeah me.
An eye for an eye is old testament stuff, it makes both sides as bad as each other.

[Andre]

"How about an open season"?

[Howlin Mad Missy]

Sorry, Haven't got time to bore you all with a long essay, but i get the impression for most people its a question of which is the worst punishment between death and a life sentence.

Are there any other people who, like me, actually are against it because its too much of a punishment?

It seems that most people that are against it is for the reason that the offender would suffer more by being kept alive in prison serving a life sentence.

Is there anyone against it simply because its wrong?

Yeah me.
An eye for an eye is old testament stuff, it makes both sides as bad as each other.

A step back to the savages we really are. Nice one.

[Kirkland Laing]

Sorry, Haven't got time to bore you all with a long essay, but i get the impression for most people its a question of which is the worst punishment between death and a life sentence.

Are there any other people who, like me, actually are against it because its too much of a punishment?

It seems that most people that are against it is for the reason that the offender would suffer more by being kept alive in prison serving a life sentence.

Is there anyone against it simply because its wrong?

Yeah me.
An eye for an eye is old testament stuff, it makes both sides as bad as each other.

A step back to the savages we really are. Nice one.

We've already done that, we've got a generation of savages running round stabbing and shooting innocent people every day. The only way to drstcally cut the number of deaths of innocent people is to execute all the savages.

[Dark Lord Al]

Sorry, Haven't got time to bore you all with a long essay, but i get the impression for most people its a question of which is the worst punishment between death and a life sentence.

Are there any other people who, like me, actually are against it because its too much of a punishment?

It seems that most people that are against it is for the reason that the offender would suffer more by being kept alive in prison serving a life sentence.

Is there anyone against it simply because its wrong?

Ok then lets have it from now on , eg. make it law that if u kill someone ( murder ) , or rape , then you get swung by the neck , then if anyones stupid enough to do it , then thats life., end of story.
Or we could make it into a TV show like the running man , and all the money raised goes to the family of the victim's.
I d pay PPV for sure.

[ryanman]

I really want to get into this thread properly but haven't quite been able to.

But my views can be summed up thusly -

Whatever the opposite to what Hammer has said/is going to say.

[Andre]

On another note, Personally some people would rather die, than be held under continual threat of death or be locked down 22 hours of the day with people they hate. Maybe a choice would be righteous.




Like that Hiati tribe that treated it captives thus: you got to choose death or ubba ubba.

Ubbu ubbu was rape by all the tribal members.

If you chose death the tribal leader would grin and yell " DEATH ! by ubba ubba".


Apparently cousin Frump did three rounds and they just gave up and moved camp on him.

[yvonne]

Sorry, Haven't got time to bore you all with a long essay, but i get the impression for most people its a question of which is the worst punishment between death and a life sentence.

Are there any other people who, like me, actually are against it because its too much of a punishment?

It seems that most people that are against it is for the reason that the offender would suffer more by being kept alive in prison serving a life sentence.

Is there anyone against it simply because its wrong?

Ok then lets have it from now on , eg. make it law that if u kill someone ( murder ) , or rape , then you get swung by the neck , then if anyones stupid enough to do it , then thats life., end of story.
Or we could make it into a TV show like the running man , and all the money raised goes to the family of the victim's.
I d pay PPV for sure.

WORD!!!Im with you on that one mate,get all the murders and pedo's onto the runningman