Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Should Blair and Bush be tried for war crimes?

Results 1 to 15 of 228

Thread: Should Bush and Blair be tried for war crimes?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1097
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bush and Blair be tried for war crimes?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    West have benefited by oil, selling more weapons and building the infrastructure back up of Iraq.
    OK #1 oil prices have gone up since the war started #2 Selling weapons has hurt us in the past #3 We benefitted by building THEIR infrastructure Maybe some contracted firms have done well in that regard but not our government. #4 Iraq is now closer to Iran politically than it used to be so that in the end is a bad thing IMO they will soon turn into another Syria.

    The war in Afghanistan was 100% legal and 100% deserved, Iraq was a rush to judgment but hell me trying to explain that to you guys is just going to get all of us irritated. The battle plans we had never took nation building into account and that was Rumsfeld's fault, every general that suggested that we needed more troops until Rummy resigned got fired.

    miles were those million people killed by the US/UK or the enemy? Were they civilians? Were they combatants? What makes it a war crime? Define what is a war crime and I'll tell you of numerous other people that deserve the title far more than Bush or Blair.
    1) a)oil price skyrocket because the idiots neo-cons thought and planned that after 3 weeks/one month the war would be over and that the IRaquis would welcome you open arms for giving them "democracy". Now they face the harsh reality of Iraq with its 2 ethnical groups not exactly at peace with each others.
    b) They don't give a wuut if we pay our oil more expensive, their friends made billions in contracts sucking off oil, supplying the troops etc. That the common citizen pays more is the least of their concern.

    2)Selling weapons profit greatly to the US, one of the biggest weapon seller in the world, do you know how many billions and billions has been given to Northop Grunmann, Carlyle Group, Boeing and such? If you want, I can even make you a list of the peoples having share into these companies (*hint* Dick Cheeney's wife is on Boeing chairboard, Douglas Feith, Papa Bush and Wolfowitz have huge shares in Carlyle and N.Grunmann* among other things)

    3) well, companies making billions to rebuild, that's already a good start as they are mostly American.

    4) Casualties include around 2 millions civilians plus 500 000 kids who died because their embargo ill designed didn't allow them to get drinkable water and other stuff they badly needed to survive, stuff they had access to, before the war.

    Only for the children they should be life sentenced. And I am not even taking in account all the rest... just to be nice.
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1732
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bush and Blair be tried for war crimes?

    In a perfect world, yes they should. But, I don't see why it should happen & it could set a dangerous precedent. I certainly feel there should be some form of punishment, but the truth is whilst they are truly despicable individuals & I wouldn't piss on them if they were on fire, they can't be blamed completely & there would be just enough doubt in the guilt for me that they shouldn't. I think what happened in the Secret Detentions programme is far more worthy of a trial in a way, because there it was far clearer that they were defying the Geneva convention & International Law.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1097
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bush and Blair be tried for war crimes?

    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    In a perfect world, yes they should. But, I don't see why it should happen & it could set a dangerous precedent. I certainly feel there should be some form of punishment, but the truth is whilst they are truly despicable individuals & I wouldn't piss on them if they were on fire, they can't be blamed completely & there would be just enough doubt in the guilt for me that they shouldn't. I think what happened in the Secret Detentions programme is far more worthy of a trial in a way, because there it was far clearer that they were defying the Geneva convention & International Law.
    The secret detention is a very very serious issue but I think that forging false proofs in order to justify an attack on a country is as despicable, especially when it is admitted that some serious neglecting did cost the life of millions of individuals including 500 000 innocent children. It is not that much because they declared war that I think they should be trial but because they forget on purpose false information to justify the thing. Now, though I am for a trial, I am not for their demise, I don't think you're any better than the "monster" if you act like him, plus making martyr is just good to fuel the fanatics on any side, which we don't need. A good prison sentence with no extra commodities would be plenty enough.
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,153
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Bush and Blair be tried for war crimes?

    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    In a perfect world, yes they should. But, I don't see why it should happen & it could set a dangerous precedent. I certainly feel there should be some form of punishment, but the truth is whilst they are truly despicable individuals & I wouldn't piss on them if they were on fire, they can't be blamed completely & there would be just enough doubt in the guilt for me that they shouldn't. I think what happened in the Secret Detentions programme is far more worthy of a trial in a way, because there it was far clearer that they were defying the Geneva convention & International Law.
    How can they not be blamed completely? Not enough to stand trial?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. One reason why I like George Bush......
    By Kev in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 08-08-2007, 02:03 PM
  2. Check out this singers Bush!
    By CountryBoy in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 07:07 PM
  3. The real power behind George Bush.........
    By Kev in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-30-2006, 11:44 PM
  4. Tony Blair to resign
    By El Kabong in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-09-2006, 11:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing