Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
bilbo,

firstly, if you don't like my lack of punctuation then don't read my comments pendejo. secondly, it's obvious you're one of those nuthugging pactardos so i won't even attempt to try to reason with you because you people don't know how to reason. it's as if your lives evolve around one boxer that frankly i think that is really sad. as far as pacquiao's resume goes, yes, he does have an impressive record and resume. but let's not act as if he's the only one with a great record and resume. the truth is this, pacquiao has ducked many fighters when he was in the lower weights. the only reason why he's fighting the big guys is because he's making a gazillon dollars. he'd be a complete idiot if he refused that money. and let's not forget that he refused to give marquez a trilogy but he sure in the hell gave morales one after beating in their second fight. yes, pacquiao has a very nice shiney record but upon closer review, it's not what it's made out to be.
Ok let's play your game for a moment.

So Hatton, De la Hoya, Cotto and Mayweather should never have happened, he should have cleared out 135 first.

So what four opponents do you think he should have fought that were better for boxing and his resume than those?