Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
difference is none of the ones already mentioned have a gift decision on their 2009 record, Froch/Dirrell basically discards Carl "hands of molasses" Froch cause he didn't win that fight
Record books don't care about personal fan opinion.
fighter of the year isn't selected by whats seen on the record books, if not Sven Ottke would have won ten times over
The official result is very important. Can you name a "fighter of the year" who lost during the year?

Also regarding Froch-Dirrell, most influential boxing journalists had the fight very close either way, not a robbery

Dan Rafael - ESPN
Doug Fischer - The Ring
Graham Huston - Boxing Monthly
Thomas Hauser - Seconds Out
Steve Bunce - Bunce Boxing

All said it was NO robbery