
Originally Posted by
C-Lo

Originally Posted by
zhubin
No question Floyd doesn't have the greatest resume...but you can make the case that Manny is taking this fight because the market demands it as well. His last three fights where cherry picked by Roach and suited his strengths and revealed the glaring weaknesses of his opponents. You very well can see the Pac momentum being halted in it's tracks by a Floyd boxing clinic.
Seriously? De La Hoya to Hatton to Cotto was "cherry picking?"
De La Hoya was weight drained on fight night but all the hyping and pre-fight predictions all thought that Manny was going to get smoked. People even thought the fight was a joke because the size difference was too much. That is not "cherry picking." Then he fought the lineal champ at 140 in Hatton, who had never lost in the weight division who also looked good in his last fight against Malignaggi. Again, not "cherry picking." Then Miguel Cotto? I'm not even going to need to explain this one, but Pac fought guys that were at one point WAY TOO big to even fathom a fight against them and beat them convincingly.
It's funny that pacmans last threefights were Cotto Hatton and Oscar and he's considered to fight anyone and Mayweathers last three fights were Oscar, Hatton and Marquez. But Pacman is considered a fearless warrior and Mayweather a cherry picker.
Lol as a fan of both it's pretty clear that Mayweather is right, he'll never get credit he desserves, even the pound for pound number 1 is not held to as high a standard as Mayweather.
I Cotto is an amazing win! but wasn't saying he was shot already? it was a cover on the ring for christ sake! The fact that Mayweather beat Oscar and HAtton first counts for nothing either? people overlook the fact he fought Oscar at 154 with all of Oscars rules.
What is Pacs best win in realitY? Cotto without Doubt! and what an amazing win it was but why is one a cherry picker and the other a warrior despite the fact they have faced virtually the same opposition in the last few fights?
Bookmarks