Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Thanks bro your a legend. Anyone know if the details of the mediation will be allowed to be made public since the fight is now off?
Array
Wait for the court case and all the various legal filings by the lawyers, we'll probably get to hear most of what went on eventually one way or another. Other than Floyd's side offering to compromise to 14 days and Manny's people saying no I don't think a lot went on really.
Drug Tests Used in Sports - Sports and Drugs - ProCon.org
Thursday, July 24, 2008
A Herndon-based company says it has developed a revolutionary urine test for human growth hormone that can detect HGH as much as two weeks after its use and could be implemented by sports anti-doping agencies in six months.Local Company Says It Has Developed Urine Test for HGH - washingtonpost.com
Scientists say breakthrough urine test for HGH developed - USATODAY.com
USADA will help fund further study of urine test for HGH - USATODAY.com
In June 2003, WADA’s Executive Committee accepted the results of an independent report stating that urine tests alone can be used to detect the presence of recombinant EPO. This report, requested by WADA’s stakeholders and commissioned by the Agency to evaluate the validity of urinary and blood tests for detecting the presence of recombinant EPO, concluded that urinary testing is the only scientifically validated method for direct detection of recombinant EPO.EPO Detection - World Anti-Doping Agency
A test for HGH was introduced at the 2004 Olympics in Athens and has since been used at the 2006 Winter Olympics in Turin. No positive tests were recordedBBC SPORT | Olympics | IOC promises tougher drugs policy
Olympic Tests Have Never Detected HGH in an Athlete: USADA Backs Urine | Bleacher Report
Ceres Nanosciences Launches First Release of Nanotrap ESP Particles
Last edited by Waleed; 01-11-2010 at 07:22 PM.
Cheers fellas plenty to read through
Array
I'm sorry but any reasonable person can read the articles provided on this thread an see the difference between them. I trust the word of Travis Tygart (chief exec of the USADA) more than that of obviously bias journalist Kevin Riley (your first article) and some article on new, experimental testing by some company called Ceres Nanosciences (your second).
Travis Tygart: "I think that it's fair to say that there are several, very potent, performance enhancing drugs that only blood can detect, and there is an entirely different method of detecting broader categories of drug use through parameter testing that is done with the blood."
Thanks![]()
Travis Tygart on Ceres Nanosciences: "We are cautiously optimistic," said Travis Tygart, CEO of USADA, the independent organization responsible for testing Olympic-bound American athletes. "They have developed an outstanding technology. And we're looking forward to helping them develop it further so it can have a practical use in anti-doping efforts."USADA will help fund further study of urine test for HGH - USATODAY.com
Caroline K. Hatton, PhD, former Associate Director of the Olympic Analytical Laboratory of the University of California at Los Angeles, in a Aug. 2007 Pediatric Clinics of North America article titled "Beyond Sports-Doping Headlines: The Science of Laboratory Tests for Performance-Enhancing Drugs," offered the following:
"Testing urine is better than testing blood for most prohibited substances (small molecules, molecular weight less than ~800 atomic mass units). Urine collection is noninvasive and yields a large volume of sample, with higher drug concentrations than in blood and with far fewer cells and proteins to complicate extraction..."Drug Tests Used in Sports - Sports and Drugs - ProCon.org
I trust the experts/scientists than someone of questionable ties.
Last edited by Waleed; 01-14-2010 at 02:21 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks