Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Super heavy? Super stupid

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4436
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    Ug, as long as the end result is the lords of the land making more money in sanctioning fees you know they will do everything in their power to make it happen.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Levittown PA
    Posts
    1,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1398
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    I honestly think boxing should go back to the way it was with only a few weight divisions. Flyweight, Bantamweight, Featherweight, Lightweight, Welterweight, Middleweight, Light heavyweight, bump the cruiserweight up to 210lbs, then heavyweight. I am so sick of these 14 different belt organizations with these ridiculous weight divisions.
    Let's be honest is there any difference between 122 and 126? If you answer yes you should be slapped.


    Now that I vented a little bit. No I don't think there should a super heavyweight division but I do think cruiserweight should be moved up like I had previously stated.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    977
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    There has never been a weight limit in the HW division. I say a prime Ali or a 21 year old Tyson could beat any of the HWs today and Tyson was only around 220 and Ali around 215. Even a 208 Holyfield (his prime weight) would be able to beat the Klit brothers.

    We have to say thank you to the WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO for expanding the weight classes to 17 and having 4 champs per division. That's the problem right there.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1450
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    If this happens then boxing will never become the huge attraction it once was ever again!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    977
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    A few weight divisions they can get rid of would be the ones separated by 3 or 4 pounds as someone mentioned already. Weight classes separated by at least 5 pounds or more keep them like the jr. lightweights, jr. welterweights, jr. middleweights, supermiddleweights, etc. They can also get rid of the strawweight and jr. flyweight classes and have the flyweight class as the lowest weight class.

    The author of the article makes a valid point that the expansion of weight classes just like the expansion of teams for certain sports have diluted the talent level.

    Boxing would get rid of many problems if they trimmed it down to something like 11 or 12 weight classes with just 1 champ per divison.

    Hell with boxing the state that is in, I wouldn't be surprised if the alphabet gangs ceated an pound for pound division.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1425
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    The fact that a Cruiserweght just beat the biggest Heavyweight in the world for a world title should suggest there is no need for a Super-Heavyweght division. We can barely put together a Heavyweight division, so what is the point of splitting it in half?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1583
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    And consider the weights of the fighters that most recently beat Wladimir Klitschko:

    Lamon Brewster 226


    Corrie Sanders 225

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1761
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    I agree we need to bump up the weight of the cruisers & get rid of these timy increase lower weights! less weights & 1 title per division is the way to get boxing back on top!

    regarding the heavyweight division i remember when u could pick up a book & look at every heavyweight champ all thru history (cos there was only 1 belt) now its a fkin mess & super heavy would make it 10 times worse.

    i started a thread asking was it time for a superheavy catergary & i got slated & rightly so!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 164
    Last Post: 05-30-2010, 12:51 PM
  2. Super 6 - UK TV
    By GuyIncognito76 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 10-10-2009, 09:57 PM
  3. Al Bernstein On Boxing: Super Six Will Be Super
    By Saddo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-18-2009, 11:01 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-16-2007, 12:12 AM
  5. WILL I BE OKAY IF I FIGHT IN THE SUPER HEAVY DIVISION?
    By LIL_IRON_MIKE in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-18-2005, 01:03 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing