Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Super heavy? Super stupid

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    And consider the weights of the fighters that most recently beat Wladimir Klitschko:

    Lamon Brewster 226


    Corrie Sanders 225

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1751
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    I agree we need to bump up the weight of the cruisers & get rid of these timy increase lower weights! less weights & 1 title per division is the way to get boxing back on top!

    regarding the heavyweight division i remember when u could pick up a book & look at every heavyweight champ all thru history (cos there was only 1 belt) now its a fkin mess & super heavy would make it 10 times worse.

    i started a thread asking was it time for a superheavy catergary & i got slated & rightly so!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1753
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    Ridiculous.............
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    I think HBO and showtime need to agree not to acknowledge this crap.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1074
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    I would vote that in 10 years they create the seriously super heavyweight belt as well. As all credibility is lost, why not going to the end in that remark?
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    828
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    Quote Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post
    I think HBO and showtime need to agree not to acknowledge this crap.
    But think of the problem it would create. If my understanding is correct they have a contract with the Klitschkos so they would be obligated to broadcast or just cough up the cash. So given the diluted nature of a super heavyweight division, HBO and Showtime should step up and say no as well. The ABC titles must make a nice amount of cash off their associations with the two networks.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1183
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    Klits are tall and big but shit I'm not even sure they'd fall in the super heavy category, it would mostly be short fat guys to lazy to get in shape...dum fuckin idea but hey could we expect anything else from the sanctioning bodies...how did they ever come to control the sport...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    9,627
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavy? Super stupid

    How bout boxers concentrate more on offensive defense like slipping the jab and getting inside, head movement of any sought on the way in. This is where the problem is, its not the size of the fighter. The heavies just need to improve their skill set, gone are the days of just walk in and hit hard. I say anyone with good head movement would trouble wlad, he is no where near cofident on the inside and nor should he be...hes 6'6 and if hes fighting on the inside then hes got a fuckin problem coz that shouldnt be his gameplan. Exactly like if your 6'2 and fighting Wlad and your on the outside then you should just quit now, thats not how you beat someone with a height advantage.

    Fuck the idea of a super heavyweight division, its just fuckin stupid.
    Hidden Content

    Please see above for my opinion

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 164
    Last Post: 05-30-2010, 12:51 PM
  2. Super 6 - UK TV
    By GuyIncognito76 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 10-10-2009, 09:57 PM
  3. Al Bernstein On Boxing: Super Six Will Be Super
    By Saddo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-18-2009, 11:01 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-16-2007, 12:12 AM
  5. WILL I BE OKAY IF I FIGHT IN THE SUPER HEAVY DIVISION?
    By LIL_IRON_MIKE in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-18-2005, 01:03 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing