Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

View Poll Results: Should this method be eligible for Championship voting?

Voters
3. This poll is closed
  • Yes

    3 100.00%
  • No

    0 0%
Results 1 to 15 of 72

Thread: Merge general threads here

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    The Big Coney
    Posts
    392
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Moving up for winning

    This is a good idea holmes
    It should only b 1 spot
    & by beatng a rankd fightr
    Fight for your spot still remains intact
    But better performances against rankd guys should b rewarded

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,023
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5118
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Moving up for winning

    Absolutely a great call.Dont know how we let it slip by all this time frankly.Good insight Greg.Always easy to give the conquered the scrutiny but even more so why should the victor of a ranked vs ranked remain idle....but is it a certainty that it will only one spot advanced?Regardless of fashion and foe defeated?

    In an odd way it emphasis's (not to go all rainbows and puppy dogs on ya) a positive voting procedure as opposed to all of the demotions.Keeps the top tier moving and rewards.

    Maybe we should require a certain amount of votes to approve it.As well...I think the manager of division should be allowed a bigger vote in matter.

    Maybe we should require that the defeated have been ranked a certain length of time for it to be allowed?As to not 'encourage' voting pool members in last minute just prior to a fight.Cynical I know

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4423
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Moving up for winning

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Absolutely a great call.Dont know how we let it slip by all this time frankly.Good insight Greg.Always easy to give the conquered the scrutiny but even more so why should the victor of a ranked vs ranked remain idle....but is it a certainty that it will only one spot advanced?Regardless of fashion and foe defeated?

    In an odd way it emphasis's (not to go all rainbows and puppy dogs on ya) a positive voting procedure as opposed to all of the demotions.Keeps the top tier moving and rewards.

    Maybe we should require a certain amount of votes to approve it.As well...I think the manager of division should be allowed a bigger vote in matter.

    Maybe we should require that the defeated have been ranked a certain length of time for it to be allowed?As to not 'encourage' voting pool members in last minute just prior to a fight.Cynical I know
    What do you think about a manager being able to blackball it with a single vote. For example if the vote happened in the super feather division and Cleon didn't think it merited it, it would junk the whole vote, otherwise majority rules.

    Also I hear what you are saying about future unintended consequences, and I agree we need a safeguard there as well. Perhaps the safeguard is as follows: "A pool member with a scheduled fight against a ranked member cannot enter the ranks on a vote until after the fight" That would pretty much eliminate that potential problem. This makes sense anyway because if he beats the ranked member he takes his spot.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2308
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Moving up for winning

    This is a good rule, I think 2 spots should be the most for an outstanding victory, 1 for a win. Majority vote should decide imo...

    I'm good with pool members not entering if they are set to meet a ranked fighter

    Good stuff Greg, keep the top ideas coming
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Moving up for winning

    Sounds good to me. I'm for it

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-22-2008, 07:21 PM
  2. Two supermassive black holes to merge
    By SalTheButcher in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-07-2006, 05:56 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing