Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 62

Thread: Was there any boxer in history more athletic than Mike Tyson?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1430
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was there any boxer in history more athletic than Mike Tyson?

    Athleticism... Hmmm that's a toughie but a great question at the same time.
    Because athleticism is something that IS entirely measurable, I think I might of devised a crude system of assessing & comparing a fighters Athletic ability.

    To begin with... I could break this down into two main categories:

    Hand Speed over Punching Power & Strength over Mobility which I shall name Balletic Ability (I think I'm naming my own abilities here )

    If you use these two categories to comprise separate lists of fighters and then cross reference those two lists, it should look something like this (these are just vague examples btw):



    Hand Speed over Punching Power The amount of power delivered with speed or visa versa but with no bias to either
    1. Mike Tyson
    2. Manny Pacquiao
    3. Roy Jones Jnr
    4. Shane Mosley
    5. Naseem Ahmed
    6. Sugar Ray Robinson
    7. Muhammad Ali
    8. Floyd Mayweather
    9. Sugar Ray Leonard

    Balletic Ability remember that this is my comparative assessment of a fighters strength over his mobility, no bias to either
    1. Muhammad Ali
    2. Roy Jones
    3. Floyd Mayweather Jnr
    4. Naseem Ahmed
    5. Sugar Ray Robinson
    6. Manny Pacquio
    7. Sugar Ray Leonard
    8. Shane Mosley
    9. Wladimir Klistchko

    I think becuase Boxing is primarily a combatant sport, in relation to cross-referencing the two categories, the bias should naturally favour ''Speed/ Power'' as supposed to ''Balletic Ability''. With that being said, a list of the top athletes in boxing (in no order) would appear to look something like this: (Again, this is very vague)

    • Roy Jones Jnr.
    • Naseem Ahmed
    • Sugar Ray Robinson
    • Shane Mosley
    • Muhammad Ali
    • Manny Pacquiao
    • Floyd Mayweather




    Now, where it becomes very interesting is where & how you establish the bias with regards to weight. By that, obviously I mean how you distinguish between fighters of different weight divisions.

    This I would do by utilizing a new catagory; Stamina over Weight. This is simply because IMO it is acceptable to assume that the fighter who is able to consistently carry the highest level of Athleticism (consistency in form of any kind) while having to carry the highest amount of bulk on his frame should be deemed the most Athletic P4P.

    So with that in mind, the most obvious picks for me would be:

    1. Muhammad Ali
    2. Roy Jones Jnr.
    3. Manny Pacquiao/ Sugar Ray Robinson can't separate the two


    However, if were were speaking in terms of simple Speed over Power then Mike Tyson is your man
    Last edited by Jimanuel Boogustus; 03-12-2010 at 03:24 PM.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    267
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    874
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was there any boxer in history more athletic than Mike Tyson?

    a bit off topic but since people have brought in athletes from other sports HERSCHEL WALKER how many people do u know who built up a frame like that by doing bodyweight excercises and to reply to an earlier posts saying that you need to be more in shape to play football than box is criminal. Football requires little more than the need for a slight ability to be able to recuperate in the 30 seconds between each play. Boxing is much harder because it taxes the aerobic system as well.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1000
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was there any boxer in history more athletic than Mike Tyson?

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth View Post
    a bit off topic but since people have brought in athletes from other sports HERSCHEL WALKER how many people do u know who built up a frame like that by doing bodyweight excercises and to reply to an earlier posts saying that you need to be more in shape to play football than box is criminal. Football requires little more than the need for a slight ability to be able to recuperate in the 30 seconds between each play. Boxing is much harder because it taxes the aerobic system as well.
    Exactly. Boxing is an hardcore cardiovascular exercise. Let's stop comparing NBA or NFL players to boxers, it's two different sports. NBA and NFL players while being athletic for their sports also get significant rest time, with only playing half of the time, in spurts, having timeouts, halftime as in the case of the NFL and in the NBA it's not like they are running 48 minutes nonstop, they also get little bit of extended breaks like when a foul is called, timeouts, halftime, ball being out of play, etc. In boxing they are constantly moving with their hands held high and also throwing punches for 3 minutes, with a short 1 minute rest between rounds. IMO boxing is just more taxing when it comes to cardiovascular activity, not to mention the damage the body accumulates from the opponents blows.

    Just because a guy does well in a particular sport does not mean he does well in another, you can speculate all you want, but that is all it is speculation. Everyone remembers when Michael Jordan tried to play baseball? Everyone was saying he's going to be greater than Babe Ruth or just as good and that baseball would be easy for him to play because it's not physically demanding as basketball, well how did that work out?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 73
    Last Post: 03-31-2009, 04:10 PM
  2. Replies: 62
    Last Post: 11-12-2007, 04:00 AM
  3. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-18-2007, 05:14 PM
  4. Replies: 42
    Last Post: 03-12-2007, 07:10 PM
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-10-2006, 10:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing